首页> 外文期刊>Parallel Algorithms and Applications >NoSQL real-time database performance comparison
【24h】

NoSQL real-time database performance comparison

机译:NoSQL实时数据库性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The amount of data being produced is increasing constantly, as the number and variety of connected devices are growing and the advances in data storage and mining are supporting this evolution. However, storing and handling high quantities of data is challenging the current Relational Database Management Systems. Big Data and its related products came to help in this matter, and the NoSQL databases arise with the purpose to offer better solutions and features to handle massive amounts of data with higher performance, sometimes near real-time. The present study presents the NoSQL databases scenario and background, and elaborates a detailed study with the characteristics, a features comparison and a performance evaluation of three different NoSQL databases extensively used in the market nowadays: Couchbase, MongoDB and RethinkDB. Tests were performed in two different scenarios: single thread and multiple threads. The results reveal that Couchbase had a better performance at most of the operations, except for retrieving multiple documents and inserting documents with multiple threads, operations in which MongoDB scored better.
机译:随着连接设备的数量和种类的增加,产生的数据量不断增加,并且数据存储和挖掘的进步正在支持这种发展。但是,存储和处理大量数据对当前的关系数据库管理系统构成了挑战。大数据及其相关产品帮助解决了这一问题,NoSQL数据库的出现是为了提供更好的解决方案和功能,以更高的性能(有时接近实时)来处理大量数据。本研究介绍了NoSQL数据库的场景和背景,并详细介绍了当今市场上广泛使用的三种不同NoSQL数据库(Couchbase,MongoDB和RethinkDB)的特性,功能比较和性能评估。测试是在两种不同的情况下执行的:单线程和多线程。结果表明,Couchbase在大多数操作上都有较好的性能,除了检索多个文档和插入具有多个线程的文档外,MongoDB得分更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号