首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Review of Education >Educational research—history of education a curious case?
【24h】

Educational research—history of education a curious case?

机译:教育研究-教育史一个奇怪的案例?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article begins with an exploration of the current state of history of education by drawing on published reviews of history of education, thematic analysis of journal content, and mapping of postgraduate study. It then highlights 'moments of insecurity'. These are characterised by a particular discourse that frames the future of the discipline in particular ways to suggest that history of education is dependent on concerted strategic decisions in response to 'moments of challenge' resulting from institutional change, and particularly in response to the disappearance of history of education from teacher education. Rather than seeing 'moments of insecurity' as stages of disintegration for disciplines the article argues that they can constitute 'moments of opportunity' when disciplines reach out to spaces shared with other disciplines to develop interdisciplinary ways of working. The article then discusses 'moments of curiosity' that enrich the methodological and substantive development of the history of education. In history of education, 'moments of curiosity' have occurred on the basis of intellectual exchange in a dialogic associational way within networks rather than being a direct outcome of strategic responses to 'moments of insecurity'. They are resulting in organic growth that is developing the landscape of history of education in several ways. The article ends by pointing to the importance of an historical dimension for bringing contextual understanding to enrich contemporary research and by stressing the need within the discipline for researchers (individually or collectively) to develop an eye for 'intelligence' and strategic vision to link their interests with current challenges in order to highlight lacunae in current practice in and for education.
机译:本文从对教育历史的现状的探索开始,它以对教育历史的已发表评论,期刊内容的主题分析以及研究生学习的地图为基础。然后强调了“不安全时刻”。这些特点以特定的话语为特征,它以特定的方式构筑了学科的未来,从而表明教育历史依赖于一致的战略决策,以应对制度变革带来的“挑战时刻”,尤其是应对教育的消失。教师的教育史。文章认为,当学科延伸到与其他学科共享的空间以发展跨学科的工作方式时,它们可以构成“机会的时刻”,而不是将“不稳定的时刻”视为学科的解体阶段。然后,本文讨论了“好奇的时刻”,这些时刻丰富了教育历史的方法论和实质发展。在教育史上,“好奇心时刻”是基于网络内对话性交流的智力交流而发生的,而不是对“不安全时刻”做出战略反应的直接结果。它们导致有机增长,以多种方式发展教育历史。本文最后指出了历史维度对于带来上下文理解以丰富当代研究的重要性,并强调了该学科内研究人员(个人或集体)发展“智能”眼和将其利益联系起来的战略远景的必要性当前的挑战,以突出当前教育实践中的缺陷。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Review of Education》 |2009年第5期|601-616|共16页
  • 作者

    Joyce Goodman; Ian Grosvenor;

  • 作者单位

    University of Winchester,;

    University of Birmingham,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:09:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号