首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Review of Education >Explaining sustained inequalities in ethnic minority school exclusions in England—passive racism in a neoliberal grip
【24h】

Explaining sustained inequalities in ethnic minority school exclusions in England—passive racism in a neoliberal grip

机译:解释英格兰少数族裔学校排斥事件中持续存在的不平等现象-新自由主义势力中的被动种族主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The enquiries into police action in the Stephen Lawrence murder, the Macpherson report and the subsequent race relations legislation have altered the political, professional and wider social climate of debate on equality issues, including inequalities in minority ethnic exclusions. The paper analyses the meanings given to racism and institutional racism, and the contested political territory which shapes and limits the possibilities of responses working towards equity. It considers the evidence on the extent to which the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 (RRAA) has been implemented, reporting particularly on sustained disproportionality in exclusions experienced by some minority ethnic groups. Disproportionalities, in terms of exclusion and attainment, are deemed 'institutionally racist' outcomes produced annually as a consequence of organisational practices, limited will and low levels of investment at national, local and school levels. Critical Race Theory and writings about 'white supremacy' attempt to explain the normal and enduring character of racism, but the outcomes of 'passive racism' are best comprehended as a product of neoliberal policy-making which limits interventions in aggregate performance for a group, giving primacy to individual effort and talent as explanatory concepts. The RRAA, in force since 2002, can, with hindsight, be seen as a legalistic, rhetorical step too far, unable to marshal governmental or institutional will and financial commitment to implement its requirements.
机译:对斯蒂芬·劳伦斯谋杀案中的警察行动的调查,麦克弗森报告以及随后的种族关系立法,改变了就平等问题进行辩论的政治,专业和更广泛的社会氛围,其中包括少数族裔排斥的不平等现象。本文分析了赋予种族主义和制度种族主义的含义,以及有争议的政治领土,该领土塑造并限制了为实现平等而做出反应的可能性。它考虑了《 2000年种族关系(修订)法》(RRAA)在多大程度上得到实施的证据,特别是报告了一些少数族裔群体经历的持续排斥现象。就排斥和成就而言,不成比例被认为是每年由于组织实践,意志有限以及在国家,地方和学校各级投资水平低而产生的“制度上的种族主义”结果。批判种族理论和有关“白人至上”的著作试图解释种族主义的正常和持久特征,但“被动种族主义”的结果最好理解为新自由主义政策制定的产物,它限制了群体对总体表现的干预,将个人努力和才能放在首位作为解释性概念。自2002年以来生效的RRAA,事后看来,可以看作是过于法制,夸夸其谈的步骤,无法调动政府或机构的意愿和财政承诺以执行其要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Review of Education》 |2009年第2期|249-265|共17页
  • 作者

    Carl Parsons;

  • 作者单位

    Canterbury Christ Church University, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:09:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号