首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Economic Papers >On measuring deprivation and living standards of societies in a multi-attribute framework
【24h】

On measuring deprivation and living standards of societies in a multi-attribute framework

机译:关于在多属性框架下衡量社会的剥夺和生活水平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When measuring a society's deprivation in a multi-attribute framework, researchers often resort to what we call a ‘column-first two-stage procedure’. Under such procedures one first determines the society's deprivation for each attribute separately by aggregating the individuals' deprivation levels in terms of that attribute, and then assesses the society's overall deprivation by aggregating the society's deprivation levels for different attributes. In this paper, we argue that all such procedures are seriously flawed insofar as none of them can satisfy simultaneously three highly appealing properties: (i) anonymity, which requires that the individuals be treated symmetrically; (ii) non-invariance, which reflects the sensitivity of the society's overall deprivation to certain switches of deprivation levels between individuals; and (iii) positive responsiveness, which requires that the society's overall deprivation must increase if the society's deprivation for some attribute increases without any decrease in the society's deprivation for any attribute.
机译:在以多属性框架衡量社会的匮乏时,研究人员经常诉诸于我们所谓的“列第一两阶段程序”。在这样的程序下,首先要通过根据该属性汇总个人的剥夺程度来分别确定每个属性的社会剥夺,然后通过汇总不同属性的社会剥夺程度来评估社会的整体剥夺。在本文中,我们认为所有此类程序都存在严重缺陷,因为它们都不能同时满足三个极具吸引力的特性:(i)匿名,要求对个人进行对称对待; (ii)不变性,反映出社会整体剥夺对个人之间某些剥夺程度转换的敏感性; (iii)积极响应,这要求如果社会对某些属性的剥夺增加而社会对任何属性的剥夺没有减少,则社会的整体剥夺必须增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Economic Papers》 |2012年第1期|p.43-56|共14页
  • 作者

    Yongsheng Xu;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:06:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号