首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >Working and Resisting when One's Workplace is Under Threat of Being Shut Down: A Lacanian Perspective
【24h】

Working and Resisting when One's Workplace is Under Threat of Being Shut Down: A Lacanian Perspective

机译:在工作场所面临被关闭威胁时的工作和抵抗:拉康主义的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The case presented here shows how a set of Lacanian concepts can be useful for analysing the behaviour of employees' representatives in a factory belonging to a large globalized and financialised corporation and threatened with closure. We identify a central characteristic of this organization (the obliteration of symbolic authority) to identify the psychic processes the employees' representatives go through as a result of this characteristic and the impact in terms of their difficulties in exerting resistance. We rest our analysis on the distinction Lacan makes between utterance and enunciation and make use of the concepts of master signifier, symbolic authority, fantasy and superego. We show that in this case the absence of symbolic authority leads the staff representatives to be taken over by the fantasy of a tyrannical and unbarred Other that has the absolute power to close down the factory at any time, and to feel guilty that they never do enough, a typical sense of guilt resulting from the superego's unfulfillable demands. This theory is also relevant for understanding the paradoxes of resistance: the staff representatives will need to reintroduce a symbolic authority so as to be able to start resisting and no longer be overwhelmed by the fantasy of an unbarred Other. We emphasize the benefits of using a Lacanian approach for understanding how discursive, psychic and emotional processes are joined in the power relations characteristic of a global capitalist corporation, and reflect on the structural conditions in which resistance is possible in contemporary organizations.
机译:这里介绍的案例显示了一组拉康主义的概念如何可用于分析属于一家大型全球化和金融化公司并面临关闭威胁的工厂中员工代表的行为。我们确定了该组织的主要特征(象征性权威的废除),以识别员工代表由于该特征而经历的心理过程以及对他们施加抵抗的困难所产生的影响。我们根据拉康在发话和发话之间的区别进行分析,并利用主指指,象征权威,幻想和超我的概念。我们证明,在这种情况下,缺乏象征性的权威导致员工代表被一个专横而不受限制的他人的幻想所接管,而他人则具有随时关闭工厂的绝对权力,并为自己从未做过而感到内足够,这是超我无法满足的需求所产生的典型的内sense感。该理论也与理解抵抗的悖论相关:工作人员代表将需要重新引入象征性的权威,以便能够开始抵抗,而不再被不受限制的他人的幻想所淹没。我们强调使用拉康主义的方法来理解将话语,心理和情感过程结合到全球资本主义公司的权力关系特征中的好处,并反思在当代组织中可能存在抵抗的结构条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号