首页> 外文期刊>Optimization and Engineering >Optimization methods for advanced design of aircraft panels: a comparison
【24h】

Optimization methods for advanced design of aircraft panels: a comparison

机译:飞机面板高级设计的优化方法:比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Advanced nonlinear analyses developed for estimating structural responses for recent applications for the aerospace industry lead to expensive computational times. However optimization procedures are necessary to quickly provide optimal designs. Several possible optimization methods are available in the literature, based on either local or global approximations, which may or may not include sensitivities (gradient computations), and which may or may not be able to resort to parallelism facilities. In this paper Sequential Convex Programming (SCP), Derivative Free Optimization techniques (DFO), Surrogate Based Optimization (SBO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) approaches are compared in the design of stiffened aircraft panels with respect to local and global instabilities (buckling and collapse). The computations are carried out with software developed for the European aeronautical industry. The specificities of each optimization method, the results obtained, computational time considerations and their adequacy to the studied problems are discussed.
机译:为估算航空航天业最新应用的结构响应而开发的高级非线性分析导致了昂贵的计算时间。但是,必须有优化程序才能快速提供最佳设计。基于局部或全局近似,文献中提供了几种可能的优化方法,这些方法可能包含或可能不包含敏感度(梯度计算),并且可能会或可能不会使用并行机制。在本文中,比较了在局部和全局不稳定性(屈曲和不稳定性)设计加硬飞机面板时,比较了顺序凸规划(SCP),自由导数优化技术(DFO),基于代理的优化(SBO)和遗传算法(GA)的方法。坍方)。该计算是使用为欧洲航空业开发的软件进行的。讨论了每种优化方法的特殊性,获得的结果,计算时间的考虑及其对所研究问题的充分性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号