...
首页> 外文期刊>Omega >Manufacturer's pricing strategy for supply chain with warranty period-dependent demand
【24h】

Manufacturer's pricing strategy for supply chain with warranty period-dependent demand

机译:保修期相关需求的供应商制造商定价策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a review of the issues associated with a manufacturer's pricing strategies in a two-echelon supply chain that comprises one manufacturer and two competing retailers, with warranty period-dependent demands. The manufacturer, as a Stackelberg leader, specifies wholesale prices to two competing retailers who face warranty period-dependent demand and have different sales costs. The manufacturer considers three pricing options: (1) setting the same price for both retailers, while disregarding their difference with regard to sales cost; (2) setting a different price to each retailer on the basis of their sales cost; and (3) setting the same price to both retailers according to the average sales cost of the industry. In this article, the retailers' optimal warranty periods and their optimal profit, manufacturer's optimal wholesale price, and his/her optimal profit associated with different pricing strategies have been derived using the game theory. Our analysis shows that the results for retailers are the same with Strategy 1 or Strategy 3. In addition, we compared the effects of different pricing strategies of the manufacturer on supply chain decisions and profit. We conclude from the results that the manufacturer should either adopt Strategy 2 with symmetrical sales cost information or Strategy 3 if retailers' sales costs are asymmetrical.
机译:本文介绍了在两级供应链中与制造商的定价策略相关的问题,该供应链包括一个制造商和两个竞争零售商,并且保修期取决于需求。作为Stackelberg的领导者,制造商将批发价格指定给两个竞争零售商,这些零售商面临保修期相关的需求,并且具有不同的销售成本。制造商考虑三种定价方式:(1)在不考虑两家零售商在销售成本方面的差异的情况下,为两家零售商设定相同的价格; (2)根据销售成本为每个零售商设定不同的价格; (3)根据行业平均销售成本对两家零售商设定相同的价格。在本文中,零售商的最优保修期及其最优利润,制造商的最优批发价格以及与不同定价策略相关联的最优利润已使用博弈理论得出。我们的分析表明,零售商的结果与策略1或策略3相同。此外,我们比较了制造商不同定价策略对供应链决策和利润的影响。我们从结果得出结论,如果零售商的销售成本不对称,则制造商应采用具有对称销售成本信息的策略2,或采用战略3。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Omega》 |2012年第6期|p.807-816|共10页
  • 作者

    Xu Chen; Ling Li; Ming Zhou;

  • 作者单位

    School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. Chengdu 610054, PR China;

    Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, College of Business and Public Administration, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 21529, USA;

    Department of Electronics, Computer, and Mechanical Engineering Technology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute. IN 47809, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    supply chain management; pricing; came theory; warranty period-dependent demand;

    机译:供应链管理;价钱;理论来了保修期相关需求;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号