首页> 外文期刊>OCLC Systems and Services >Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in Open Access journals:A survey of academic librarians in Africa
【24h】

Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in Open Access journals:A survey of academic librarians in Africa

机译:在开放获取期刊上发表学术论文的看法,偏好:对非洲学术图书馆员的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of the study is to know the various factors librarians consider while selecting Open Access (OA) journal for publication and to identify the challenges librarians face with OA journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Online questionnaire was designed to collect data from 402 academic librarians in 87 universities in Africa using SurveyMonkey software. Findings - The study found that academic librarians are aware of the "green" and "gold" routes but not familiar with the "diamond" route. The study revealed that a large number of the academic librarians have published only one paper in OA journals, followed by those who have not published any paper in OA journals. The study also revealed that reputation of journal and impact factor of journal were seen as very important among the factors that inform them of choosing OA The majority of the respondents agreed that author fees, and lack of stable internet connectivity are the major barriers to publishing in OA journals. Practical implications - The study recommends that academic libraries in institutions of higher learning in Africa should organize seminars periodically on the need for their librarians to research and publish in OA journals. Social implications - Identifying factors involved in author decisions to publish in OA journals will help illuminate issues that may encourage or discourage author support of OA publishing models. Further understanding of these issues can assist the efforts to improve author perceptions of and confidence in OA publications. Originality/value - It is believed that this study of African librarians publishing in OA journals is the first study in the region.
机译:目的-研究的目的是了解馆员在选择开放获取(OA)期刊进行出版时要考虑的各种因素,并确定馆员在OA期刊出版中面临的挑战。设计/方法/方法-在线问卷旨在使用SurveyMonkey软件从非洲87所大学的402名学术图书馆员中收集数据。调查结果-研究发现,大学图书馆馆员了解“绿色”和“黄金”路线,但不熟悉“钻石”路线。该研究表明,许多学术图书馆馆员仅在OA期刊上发表过一篇论文,其次是未在OA期刊上发表过任何论文的人。该研究还显示,期刊的声誉和期刊的影响因素被认为是影响他们选择OA的因素中非常重要的。大多数受访者都认为,作者的费用以及缺乏稳定的互联网连接是出版期刊的主要障碍。 OA期刊。实际意义-研究建议非洲高等学校的大学图书馆应定期组织研讨会,讨论其图书馆员需要研究并在OA期刊上发表的情况。社会影响-识别作者决定在OA期刊上发表的决定所涉及的因素,将有助于阐明可能鼓励或阻碍作者对OA出版模型的支持的问题。对这些问题的进一步理解可以帮助改善作者对开放获取出版物的认识和信心。原创性/价值-可以认为,对在OA期刊上发表非洲图书管理员的这项研究是该地区的第一项研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号