In tort, where indivisible damage is done by two parties, each will be 'jointly and severally liable'for the losses suffered by the claimant, who can recover the full damages from either or both. In London Borough of Hackney v Sivanandan the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) finds that tribunals do not have discretion in deciding whether or not to apportion damages in discrimination cases - for example making the employer liable for the lion's share on grounds that it has the deeper pockets - and must make joint and several awards except where the injury caused by a discriminatory act is clearly divisible.
展开▼
机译：在侵权行为中，如果有两方共同造成不可分割的损害，则每一方将对索赔人所遭受的损失承担“连带责任”，索赔人可以从任何一方或双方追回全部损失。在伦敦哈克尼诉西瓦南丹（Bockough of Hackney v Sivanandan）案中，就业上诉法庭（EAT）裁定，仲裁庭在决定是否在歧视案件中分配损害赔偿金方面没有酌处权-例如，使雇主对大部分股份承担责任，理由是雇主应承担更大的责任。口袋-并且必须做出连胜裁决，除非歧视行为所造成的伤害可以明显分割。
展开▼
