首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >BOILING WATER REACTOR STABILITY ANALYSIS BY TRACE/PARCS: MODELING EFFECTS AND CASE STUDY OF TIME VERSUS FREQUENCY DOMAIN APPROACH
【24h】

BOILING WATER REACTOR STABILITY ANALYSIS BY TRACE/PARCS: MODELING EFFECTS AND CASE STUDY OF TIME VERSUS FREQUENCY DOMAIN APPROACH

机译:痕量/颗粒物对沸水反应堆稳定性的分析:时间效应和频率域方法的建模效果和案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The TRACE/PARCS code was applied in this work to examine the validity of the coupled three-dimensional thermal-hydraulics and neutronics system analysis codes for boiling water reactor stability analysis. The evaluation was performed against the Ringhals-1 stability tests and compared with the frequency domain analysis using the code STAB. A comprehensive assessment of modeling choices for the TRACE stability analysis has been made, including effects of time-space discretization and numerical schemes, thermal-hydraulics channel grouping, neutronics modeling, and control system modeling. It was found that with careful control of numerical diffusion, the predictions from TRACE agree reasonably well with the Ringhals-1 test results and the predictions from STAB. The benchmark results of both codes against the Ringhals stability test are found to be at the same level of accuracy. The biases for the predicted global decay ratio are ~0.07 in TRACE results and —0.04 in STAB results. However, the standard deviations of their decay ratios are both large, —0.1, indicating large uncertainties in both analyses. The uncertainties in both modeling approaches are identified. Although the TRACE code uses more sophisticated neutronics and thermal-hydraulics models, the modeling uncertainty is not less than that of the STAB code.
机译:在这项工作中使用了TRACE / PARCS代码,以检查耦合的三维热工液压系统和中子电子系统分析代码对沸水反应堆稳定性分析的有效性。针对Ringhals-1稳定性测试进行了评估,并与使用代码STAB的频域分析进行了比较。已经对TRACE稳定性分析的建模选择进行了全面评估,包括时空离散化和数值方案,热工液压通道分组,中子学建模和控制系统建模的影响。结果发现,通过仔细控制数值扩散,TRACE的预测与Ringhals-1测试结果和STAB的预测相当吻合。发现这两个代码相对于Ringhals稳定性测试的基准结果具有相同的准确性。 TRACE结果的预测整体衰减率偏差为〜0.07,STAB结果的预测偏差为-0.04。但是,它们的衰减比的标准偏差都很大,为-0.1,这表明两次分析的不确定性都很大。确定了两种建模方法的不确定性。尽管TRACE代码使用更复杂的中子学和热工液压模型,但是建模不确定性不小于STAB代码的不确定性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2012年第1期|p.8-28|共21页
  • 作者

    RUI HU; MUJID S. KAZIMI;

  • 作者单位

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems Nuclear Science and Engineering Department, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139;

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems Nuclear Science and Engineering Department, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号