首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear science and engineering >Radial and Azimuthal ~(235)U Fission and ~(238)U Capture Distributions in BWR UO_2 Pins: CASMO-4 and MCNP4C: Versus Activation Foil Measurements
【24h】

Radial and Azimuthal ~(235)U Fission and ~(238)U Capture Distributions in BWR UO_2 Pins: CASMO-4 and MCNP4C: Versus Activation Foil Measurements

机译:BWR UO_2引脚中的径向和方位角〜(235)U裂变和〜(238)U捕获分布:CASMO-4和MCNP4C:与激活箔测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the context of the LWR-PROTEUS program, radial and azimuthal ~(235)U fission (F_5) and ~(238)U capture (C_8) rate distributions have been calculated for zero-burnup pins of a Westinghouse SVEA-96 Optima2 boiling water reactor fuel assembly using the stochastic MCNP4C and the deterministic CASMO-4 codes. The within-pin F_5 distributions predicted by the two codes are in very good agreement; the C_8 distributions are more pronounced, and there are significant discrepancies between the codes, both azi-muthally and radially. The calculations have been compared with experimental results obtained from activation foil measurements in two pins of the assembly irradiated in the center of the PROTEUS test zone. The measurements confirm that the two codes can accurately predict the radial and azimuthal F_5 distributions but that MCNP4C within-pin C_8 distributions are much more accurate than those of CASMO-4.
机译:在LWR-PROTEUS程序的上下文中,已经为西屋SVEA-96 Optima2沸腾的零燃烧销计算了径向和方位角〜(235)U裂变(F_5)和〜(238)U捕获(C_8)速率分布水堆燃料组件使用随机MCNP4C和确定性CASMO-4代码。这两个代码预测的引脚内F_5分布非常吻合。 C_8分布更加明显,并且代码之间在方位角和径向上都有明显的差异。该计算结果已与从辐照在PROTEUS测试区中心的组件的两个销中的活化箔测量获得的实验结果进行了比较。测量结果证实这两个代码可以准确预测径向和方位角F_5分布,但是引脚C_8内的MCNP4C比CASMO-4精确得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号