...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. B, Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms >A comparison of MCNP6-1.0 and GEANT 4-10.1 when evaluating the neutron output of a complex real world nuclear environment: The thermal neutron facility at the Tri Universities Meson facility
【24h】

A comparison of MCNP6-1.0 and GEANT 4-10.1 when evaluating the neutron output of a complex real world nuclear environment: The thermal neutron facility at the Tri Universities Meson facility

机译:在评估复杂的现实世界核环境的中子输出时,MCNP6-1.0和GEANT 4-10.1的比较:特里大学梅森分校的热中子设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparison of the Monte Carlo based simulation codes MCNP6-1.0 and GEANT4-10.1 as used for modelling large scale structures is presented here. The high-energy neutron field at the Tri Universities Meson Facility (TRIUMF) in Vancouver, British Columbia is the structure modelled in this work. Work with the emphasis on the modelling of the facility and comparing with experimental results has been published previously, whereas this work is focussed on comparing the performance of the codes over relatively high depths of material rather than the accuracy of the results themselves in comparison to experimental data. Comparisons of three different locations within the neutron facility are modelled and presented using both codes as well as analysis of the transport of typical neutrons fields through large blocks of iron, water, lead and aluminium in order to determine where any deviations are likely to have occurred. Results indicate that over short distances, results from the two codes are in broad agreement - although over greater distances and within more complex geometries, deviation increases dramatically. The conclusions reached are that it is likely the deviations between the codes is caused by both the compounding effect of slight differences between the cross section files used by the two codes to determine the neutron transport through iron, and differences in the processes used by both codes.
机译:此处介绍了用于建模大型结构的基于蒙特卡洛的仿真代码MCNP6-1.0和GEANT4-10.1的比较。不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华的Tri University Meson Facility(TRIUMF)中的高能中子场就是这项工作的模型。先前已经发表了强调设备建模并与实验结果进行比较的工作,而这项工作则侧重于在相对较高的材料深度上比较代码的性能,而不是与实验相比,结果本身的准确性。数据。使用这两个代码对中子设施中三个不同位置的比较进行建模和呈现,并分析典型中子场通过大块铁,水,铅和铝的传输,以确定可能在何处发生偏差。结果表明,在短距离上,这两个代码的结果大致吻合-尽管在更长的距离上和更复杂的几何形状内,偏差会急剧增加。得出的结论是,这两个编码之间的偏差很可能是由两个编码用来确定中子通过铁的输运的横截面文件之间的微小差异的复合效应以及两个编码所使用的过程差异引起的。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号