...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment >A Monte Carlo comparison of PGNAA system performance using Cf-252 neutrons, 2.8-MeV neutrons and 14-MeV neutrons
【24h】

A Monte Carlo comparison of PGNAA system performance using Cf-252 neutrons, 2.8-MeV neutrons and 14-MeV neutrons

机译:使用Cf-252中子,2.8 MeV中子和14 MeV中子的PGNAA系统性能的蒙特卡洛比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to compare performance of a Cf-252 neutron and a 14-MeV neutron-based prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) system with that of the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Since the energy of neutron beam used in the KFUPM PGNAA system is very close to that produced by a DD neutron generator, performance comparison between a DD and a DT neutron generator-based PGNAA system is highly desired. For the sake of comparison, the calculations were carried out for the PGNAA system with geometry similar to the KFUPM PGNAA system. These calculations were required to determine improvement in performance of the KFUPM PGNAA system if its 2.8-MeV neutron source is replaced by a Cf-252 neutron source or a 14-MeV neutron source. Results of the calculations revealed that the geometry of the Cf-252 neutron and the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system are not significantly different but the geometry of the 14-MeV neutron-based system is significantly different from that of the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system. Accordingly, the prompt gamma-ray yields from the Cf-252 neutron and the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system is comparable but prompt gamma-ray yields from 14-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system are about three times smaller than that from the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system. This study has shown that performance of the Cf-252 neutron-based PGNAA system is comparable with that of the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system but the performance of the 14-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system is poorer than that of the 2.8-MeV neutron-based PGNAA system. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. [References: 10]
机译:进行了蒙特卡洛模拟,以比较法赫德国王大学使用Cf-252中子和基于14 MeV中子的瞬发伽马射线中子活化分析(PGNAA)系统与基于2.8 MeV中子的PGNAA系统的性能沙特阿拉伯达兰的石油和矿产(KFUPM)局。由于KFUPM PGNAA系统中使用的中子束能量与DD中子发生器产生的能量非常接近,因此非常需要在DD和DT中子发生器的PGNAA系统之间进行性能比较。为了进行比较,对几何形状类似于KFUPM PGNAA系统的PGNAA系统进行了计算。如果将其2.8 MeV中子源替换为Cf-252中子源或14 MeV中子源,则需要进行这些计算来确定KFUPM PGNAA系统性能的提高。计算结果表明,Cf-252中子和基于2.8MeV中子的PGNAA系统的几何形状没有显着差异,但基于14MeV的中子系统的几何形状与2.8MeV的几何形状显着不同基于中子的PGNAA系统。因此,来自Cf-252中子和基于2.8MeV中子的PGNAA系统的即时伽马射线产量是可比的,但来自基于14MeV中子的PGNAA系统的即时伽马射线产量比来自Cf-252中子的PGNAA系统的即时伽马射线产量低约三倍。基于2.8 MeV中子的PGNAA系统。这项研究表明,基于Cf-252中子的PGNAA系统的性能与基于2.8 MeV中子的PGNAA系统的性能相当,但是基于14 MeV中子的PGNAA系统的性能却比2.8差-基于MeV中子的PGNAA系统。 (C)2003 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。 [参考:10]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号