首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment >Comparison of model fitting and gated integration for pulse shape discrimination and spectral estimation of digitized lanthanum halide scintillator pulses
【24h】

Comparison of model fitting and gated integration for pulse shape discrimination and spectral estimation of digitized lanthanum halide scintillator pulses

机译:模型拟合和门控积分用于脉冲形状判别和数字化卤化镧闪烁体脉冲频谱估计的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An analysis of digitized pulse waveforms from experiments with LaBr_3(Ce) and LaCl_3(Ce) detectors is presented. Pulse waveforms from both scintillator types were captured in the presence of ~(22)Na and ~(60)Co sources and also background alone. Two methods to extract pulse shape discrimination (PSD) parameters and estimate energy spectra were compared. The first involved least squares fitting of the pulse waveforms to a physics-based model of one or two exponentially modified Gaussian functions. The second was the conventional gated integration method. The model fitting method produced better PSD than gated integration for LaCl_3(Ce) and higher resolution energy spectra for both scintillator types. A disadvantage to the model fitting approach is that it is more computationally complex and about 5 times slower. LaBr_3(Ce) waveforms had a single decay component and showed no ability for alpha/electron PSD. LaCl_3(Ce) was observed to have short and long decay components and alpha/electron discrimination was observed.
机译:给出了使用LaBr_3(Ce)和LaCl_3(Ce)检测器进行实验得到的数字化脉冲波形的分析结果。在〜(22)Na和〜(60)Co源以及仅背景存在的情况下,捕获了两种闪烁体的脉冲波形。比较了两种提取脉冲形状识别(PSD)参数和估计能量谱的方法。首先是将脉冲波形与一个或两个指数修正的高斯函数的基于物理的模型进行最小二乘拟合。第二种是常规的门控集成方法。对于LaCl_3(Ce),模型拟合方法产生的PSD优于门控积分,并且两种闪烁体的分辨能谱均更高。模型拟合方法的缺点是计算量更大,并且速度慢约5倍。 LaBr_3(Ce)波形具有单个衰减分量,并且没有显示α/电子PSD的能力。观察到LaCl_3(Ce)具有短和长的衰变成分,并观察到α/电子鉴别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号