...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research >Estimation of effective atomic number in the Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio using different methods
【24h】

Estimation of effective atomic number in the Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio using different methods

机译:使用不同方法估算瑞利与康普顿散射比中的有效原子序数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio (R/C) is a very convenient parameter, which can be utilized in material analysis and estimating effective atomic number (Z_(eff)). In the case for a relatively low scattering angle, for which the energy of the Compton scattered photons is not very much different from that of incident photons, the corrections due to self-absorption for Rayleigh and Compton scattering will be roughly equal. Therefore, it enables a result to be obtained which is almost independent of X-ray attenuation inside the sample and it will depend only on the material under investigation. The most frequently used method for calculation of Z_(eff) available in literature is plotting R/C of elements as a function of atomic number and constituting the best fit curve. From this fit curve, the respective Z_(eff) can be determined using R/C of the material. In the present study, we report Z_(eff) of different materials using different methods such as interpolation and direct methods as possible alternatives to the most common fitting method. The results were compared with the experiments wherever possible. The agreement between interpolation method and the fitting method was found to be very satisfactory as relative changes (%) were always less than 9% while the direct method results with somehow significantly higher values of Z_(eff) when compared to the other methods.
机译:瑞利与康普顿散射比(R / C)是非常方便的参数,可用于材料分析和估算有效原子序数(Z_(eff))。在相对较低的散射角的情况下,康普顿散射光子的能量与入射光子的能量差别不大,由于瑞利和康普顿散射的自吸收引起的校正将大致相等。因此,它能够获得几乎与样品内部X射线衰减无关的结果,并且仅取决于所研究的材料。文献中最常用的计算Z_(eff)的方法是绘制元素的R / C作为原子序数的函数并构成最佳拟合曲线。根据该拟合曲线,可以使用材料的R / C确定相应的Z_(eff)。在本研究中,我们使用不同的方法(例如插值法和直接法)报告不同材料的Z_(eff),以作为最常见拟合方法的替代方法。尽可能将结果与实验进行比较。插值方法和拟合方法之间的一致性非常令人满意,因为相对变化(%)始终小于9%,而直接方法的结果Z_(eff)则明显高于其他方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号