首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Engineering and Design >Modular HTR confinement/containment and the protection against aircraft crash
【24h】

Modular HTR confinement/containment and the protection against aircraft crash

机译:模块化HTR禁闭/围堵以及防止飞机坠毁的保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Does an HTR need a containment - pressure resistant - or is it possible - licensable - to have only a so-called confinement. The answer depends on both the results of the safety analysis of the accidents considered in the design and the acceptance by the licensing authorities and the public of a safety approach only based on severe core damage exclusion. The safety approach to be developed for modular HTRs must describe the application of the defence in depth principle for such reactors. Whatever the requirements on the last confinement barrier could be, a convincing demonstration of the exclusion of any severe core damage is needed, relying on exhaustive and bounding considerations of severe core damage initiators and the use of non-questionable arguments. The paper presents the containment issues for HTRs based on German experience background and considerations for modern modular HTR safety approach including beyond design situations. 1. For the German HTRs (designed in the 80s), it could be shown in the licensing procedures in Germany that there was no need for a pressure retaining and gas tight containment to enclose radioactive nuclides released from the nuclear heat source. Instead, the confinement envelope acted in conjunction with other barriers to minimize the release of radioactive nuclides and the radiological impact on the environment. 2. The confinement envelope consisted of the reactor building, a sub-atmospheric pressure system, a building pressure relief system, an HVAC systems isolation and a filtration system. 3. During a major depressurization accident, unfiltered releases were discharged to the environment. The analyses results show that the environmental impact was far below the dose limits according to the German Radiological Protection Ordinance, even when the effect of filters was not taken into account. 4. The demonstration strongly relied on the assumptions made for the source term definition, e.g. the fuel particles failure rates (under irradiation and during accidental conditions), the diffusion data, the dust data and the deposition/lift-off mechanisms. 5. For modern modular HTRs, the last confinement barrier performances will have to be determined in accordance with the set of accidents to be considered in the design including internal and external hazards and the limits targeted for the public and the environment protection. Further more the paper presents an analysis of effects of a deliberate crash of a large commercial airliner on a former German HTR design.
机译:HTR是否需要安全壳-耐压-还是可能-可许可-仅具有所谓的限制。答案取决于设计中考虑的事故的安全性分析结果,以及许可证颁发机构和公众是否仅基于严重的核心损坏排除才接受安全方法。为模块化高温气冷堆开发的安全方法必须描述这种反应堆的纵深防御原理的应用。无论对最后一个限制屏障的要求是什么,都需要有说服力的证明来排除任何严重的岩心损害,这要依赖于对严重岩心损害引发者的详尽和有限的考虑,以及使用毫无疑问的论点。本文基于德国的经验背景以及现代模块化HTR安全方法(包括超出设计情况)的考虑,提出了HTR的收容问题。 1.对于德国的高温气冷堆(设计于80年代),在德国的许可程序中可以表明,不需要保压和气密性容器来封闭从核热源释放的放射性核素。取而代之的是,限制包膜与其他障碍共同作用,以最大程度地减少放射性核素的释放和对环境的放射学影响。 2.限制区包括反应堆建筑物,低于大气压的系统,建筑物的泄压系统,HVAC系统的隔离和过滤系统。 3.在一次重大的降压事故中,未经过滤的排放物被排放到环境中。分析结果表明,即使不考虑过滤器的影响,对环境的影响也远远低于德国放射防护条例规定的剂量限值。 4.演示强烈依赖于对源术语定义所做的假设,例如燃料颗粒故障率(在辐照和意外情况下),扩散数据,粉尘数据和沉积/提离机制。 5.对于现代的模块化高温气冷堆,必须根据设计中要考虑的事故集合(包括内部和外部危害以及针对公众和环境保护的极限)来确定最后的隔离屏障性能。此外,本文还分析了大型商业客机故意坠毁对德国HTR设计的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Engineering and Design》 |2006年第16期|p.1612-1616|共5页
  • 作者

    Gerd Brinkmann;

  • 作者单位

    Framatome ANP GmbH, Freyeslebenstrasse 1, Postfach 2330, 91058 Erlangen, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 原子能技术;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:46:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号