首页> 外文期刊>Nonlinear Dynamics >Comparison between the HAM and HPM solutions of thin film flows of non-Newtonian fluids on a moving belt
【24h】

Comparison between the HAM and HPM solutions of thin film flows of non-Newtonian fluids on a moving belt

机译:运动带上非牛顿流体薄膜流的HAM和HPM解决方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we prove in general that the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) proposed in 1998 is only a special case of the homotopy analysis method (HAM) profound in 1992 when ? = ?1. Besides, by using the thin film flows of Sisko and Oldroyd 6-constant fluids on a moving belt as examples, we show that the solutions given by HPM (Siddiqui, A.M., Ahmed, M., Ghori, Q.K.: Chaos Solitons and Fractals (2006) in press) are divergent, and thus useless. However, by choosing a proper value of the auxiliary parameter ?, we give convergent series solution by means of the HAM. These two examples also show that, different from the HPM and other traditional analytic techniques, the HAM indeed provides us with a simple way to ensure the convergence of the solution.
机译:在本文中,我们总体上证明了1998年提出的同伦扰动方法(HPM)仅是1992年意义深远的同伦分析方法(HAM)的特例。 = 1。此外,以运动带上的Sisko和Oldroyd 6常数流体的薄膜流为例,我们证明了HPM(Siddiqui,AM,Ahmed,M.,Ghori,QK:混沌孤子和分形( 2006年)在新闻中)是分歧的,因此没有用。但是,通过选择辅助参数α的适当值,我们可以通过HAM给出收敛级数解。这两个示例还表明,与HPM和其他传统分析技术不同,HAM确实为我们提供了一种确保解决方案收敛的简单方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号