首页> 外文期刊>New writing >Historicising 'craft' In The Teaching Of Fiction
【24h】

Historicising 'craft' In The Teaching Of Fiction

机译:在小说教学中对“工艺”进行历史化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay argues that creative writing pedagogy relies upon a dehistoricised approach to the notion of 'craft' in which the formal elements of fiction, such as voice and point of view (POV), are conceptualised as static and unchanging 'building blocks' for writers. Illustrative samples of writing are thus understood synchronically, disavowing the historical contingency and mutabiltity of formal categories. The essay argues that a diachronic approach to the teaching of craft will enable formal elements of fiction to be used as heuristic devices for historicising writing samples, thus opening up possibilities for refining and adapting these elements to the concerns of contemporary writers. As a case study, the essay analyses the way in which handbooks produced by teachers of creative writing adopt a 'pros' and 'con's' approach to the use of narrative voice. This approach, in the guise of 'practical advice', perpetuates a modernist aesthetic prejudice for impersonal modes of narration. The essay will draw attention to new modes of omniscient narration being developed in contemporary fiction which complicate this approach to the teaching of narrative voice.
机译:本文认为,创造性写作教学法依赖于对“工艺”概念的非历史化方法,在这种方法中,小说的形式元素(例如语音和观点)被概念化为静态的,不变的“构件” 。因此,同步地理解了说明性的写作样本,从而摒弃了形式范畴的历史偶然性和可变性。本文认为,历时的手工艺教学方法将使虚构的形式元素能够用作启发性手段,对书写样本进行历史化处理,从而开辟了将这些元素提炼和适应当代作家关注的可能性。作为案例研究,本文分析了创意写作老师制作的手册采用叙事语态的“利弊”和“利弊”的方式。这种以“实践建议”为幌子的做法,使现代主义审美观念对非个人叙事模式产生了永久性的偏见。本文将提请注意当代小说正在发展的全知叙事的新模式,这种新模式使这种叙事声音教学方法变得更加复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号