首页> 外文期刊>Network world >Did NSA leave itself a back door?
【24h】

Did NSA leave itself a back door?

机译:NSA留下了自己的后门吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Is there any better indication of how far our freedoms have eroded than the frequency and vigor with which security experts question the means and motivation behind U.S. government actions purportedly intended to keep us safe? Suspicion of the government has always been natural, of course, but today it has become — quite rightfully — a defense mechanism of the first order. The latest example comes from the field of cryptography: Security consultant Bruce Schneier, leaning on analyses from other experts, last week questioned why one of four government-sanctioned random-number generators — the one "three orders of magnitude slower than its peers"— includes what "can only be described as a back door."
机译:没有什么迹象比安全专家质疑美国政府旨在维护我们安全的行为背后的手段和动机所频发的程度和活力更能说明我们的自由受到了多大程度的侵蚀?当然,对政府的怀疑一直是自然而然的,但是今天,它已经(很合理地)成为一阶防御机制。最新的例子来自密码学领域:安全顾问布鲁斯·施耐尔(Bruce Schneier)依靠其他专家的分析,上周质疑为什么四个政府批准的随机数生成器之一-一个“比同行慢三个数量级”-包括“只能描述为后门”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号