首页> 外文期刊>Netnomics >Competitive resource sharing by Internet Service Providers
【24h】

Competitive resource sharing by Internet Service Providers

机译:互联网服务提供商的竞争性资源共享

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We look at non-cooperative resource sharing (a generalization of paid peering) among Internet Service Providers (ISPs), where individually rational providers who not only compete for customers but also participate in resource sharing, in order to utilize underlying complementarities in cost structures. In particular, we are interested in the following question: would simple, easy-to-implement access pricing mechanisms guarantee ex-ante participation in resource sharing even by providers who, subsequent to deciding participation, engage in competition for customers, set access prices and make routing decisions? We first show that, in presence of linear access pricing, participation in the sharing arrangement is possible, but not guaranteed. We then show that a two-part tariff guarantees participation in the sharing agreement—this is not obvious given that resource sharing alters customer bases. We also show that our mechanism is robust to providers mis-reporting their types. Next, we show that, though both providers choose strictly positive customer bases, one of the them has no incentive to utilize the resources of the other and effectively acts as a resource supplier, whereas the other provider utilizes both resources. Finally, we show the robustness of our results to different cost structure and game forms, and provide some policy implications. Our results have significant implications not only for policy design since they suggest that paid peering should be encouraged but also for design of realistic traffic engineering protocols.
机译:我们将研究Internet服务提供商(ISP)之间的非合作资源共享(付费对等关系的概括),其中,各个理性的提供商不仅要争夺客户,还要参与资源共享,以便利用成本结构中的基本互补性。特别是,我们对以下问题感兴趣:简单,易于实施的访问定价机制,即使由提供者决定参与后参与客户竞争,设定访问价格和做出路由决策?我们首先表明,在存在线性访问定价的情况下,参与共享安排是可能的,但不能保证。然后,我们证明了由两部分组成的费率可保证参与共享协议-考虑到资源共享会改变客户群,这并不明显。我们还表明,我们的机制对于提供程序错误报告其类型的能力很强。接下来,我们表明,尽管两家提供商都选择严格的积极客户基础,但其中一家没有动力去利用另一家的资源并有效地充当资源提供商,而另一家却利用了这两种资源。最后,我们展示了我们的结果对于不同成本结构和博弈形式的稳健性,并提供了一些政策含义。我们的结果不仅对策略设计有重要意义,因为它们建议应鼓励付费对等,而且对现实的流量工程协议的设计也具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号