首页> 外文期刊>Neophilologus >Growth and the Grid: Organic vs Constructivist Conceptions of Poetry
【24h】

Growth and the Grid: Organic vs Constructivist Conceptions of Poetry

机译:增长与网格:有机与建构主义诗歌观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two important types of metaphors have dominated the history of poetics: organic and constructivist metaphors. This article first examines both conceptions by analysing different volumes of poetry in English and determining their place in respectively the organic and the constructivist traditions, in order to chart the interaction of both conceptions in 20th-century poetic volumes by T. S. Eliot, Louis Zukofsky, Sylvia Plath, and Simon Armitage. The notion of “growth” as it was employed e.g. in Whitman criticism is contrasted to the notion of the “grid,” which is emblematic of the modernist ambition, according to Rosalind Krauss. From the perspective of genetic criticism, however, both conceptions usually appear to be inextricably intertwined in 20th-century poetry. As a consequence, the article pleads for a form of literary criticism that considers both a transitive and an intransitive type of poetic “growth.”
机译:诗歌历史上有两种重要的隐喻类型:有机隐喻和建构主义隐喻。本文首先通过分析英语的不同诗词量并确定它们在有机和建构主义传统中的地位来研究这两种概念,以便绘制TS艾略特,路易·祖科夫斯基,西尔维亚的20世纪诗论中两种概念的相互作用。普拉斯和西蒙·阿米蒂奇。采用“增长”的概念,例如罗莎琳德·克劳斯(Rosalind Krauss)认为,惠特曼的批评与“网格”的概念形成鲜明对比,网格是现代主义野心的象征。然而,从基因批评的角度来看,这两种观念通常似乎在20世纪诗歌中密不可分。结果,这篇文章提出了一种文学批评形式,该文学批评形式既考虑了传递性的又是不传递性的诗意的“增长”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Neophilologus》 |2006年第3期|491-507|共17页
  • 作者

    Dirk Van Hulle;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Literatures in English, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:20:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号