首页> 外文期刊>Neohelicon >Rilke’s and Goldberg’s Prodigal Son: two modern interpretations of a Christian theme
【24h】

Rilke’s and Goldberg’s Prodigal Son: two modern interpretations of a Christian theme

机译:里尔克和戈德堡的败家子:基督教主题的两种现代解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The New Testament parable of the “Prodigal Son” has many interpretations in literature and art. In this article I focus on two poetic examples: Rilke’s “Der Auszug des Verlorenen Sohnes” and Lea Goldberg’s “The Prodigal Son,” a cycle of three poems: “On the Road,” “In the House,” and “Repentance”. I will show the differences between the poets’ approaches to the parable. “The Parable of the Prodigal Son” is part of a series of parables in Luke 15–19. Most traditional Christian exegeses regard the prodigal son’s action as an act of sin and repentance. As we shall prove, Rilke and Goldberg employed the parable in different ways. Rilke used it as a springboard for his own ideas. He was interested in the moment of departure as a symbol of an infinite search for a new path. Goldberg remained closer to the biblical narrative, but she used the parable as a psychological platform to explore the prodigal son’s feelings on his return home, and his family’s reaction to his absence and homecoming.
机译:“败家子”的新约寓言在文学和艺术上有许多解释。在本文中,我将重点关注两个诗意的例子:里尔克的《 Der Auszug des Verlorenen Sohnes》和利娅·戈德堡的《浪子》,这三首诗的循环:“在路上”,“在屋子里”和“悔改”。我将展示诗人的寓言方法之间的差异。 “浪子的寓言”是路加福音15-19中一系列寓言的一部分。大多数传统的基督教徒认为浪子的行为是犯罪和and悔的行为。正如我们将要证明的那样,里尔克和戈德堡以不同的方式采用了这个寓言。 Rilke将其用作自己想法的跳板。他对出发的那一刻很感兴趣,这是无限寻求新道路的象征。戈德堡(Goldberg)仍然更接近圣经的叙述,但她以此寓言作为心理平台,来探讨浪子回国后的感受,以及家人对他的缺席和归乡的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号