首页> 外文期刊>Naturwissenschaften >The multiple faces of journal peer review
【24h】

The multiple faces of journal peer review

机译:期刊同行评审的多重面孔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is probably no case that has shaped the academic world as much as the institution of the peer-review system. Peer review of scholarly work has existed for centuries (Kronick 1990, and references therein); however, its use across all fields of science and academia is the result of seeking consensus in quality standards of published work, a process that has mainly developed throughout the second half of the 20th century. Today, even graduate students have a perception of the use and impact of peer review in science, and its importance on one's personal career perspectives. Originally aiming to improve the quality of publishing in academic journals, peer review has become part of many aspects of the academic process, ranging from the assessment of research proposals and reports, to performance assessment and promotion processes of the peers themselves.
机译:可能没有任何一个案例可以像同行评审制度那样对学术界产生重大影响。对学术著作的同行评审已有数百年历史了(Kronick 1990,及其中的参考文献)。但是,它在科学和学术界的所有领域中的使用是在已发表作品的质量标准中寻求共识的结果,这一过程主要发展到整个20世纪下半叶。如今,即使是研究生,也可以理解同行评审在科学中的用途和影响,以及它对个人个人职业观点的重要性。同行评审最初旨在提高学术期刊的出版质量,它已经成为学术过程许多方面的一部分,从评估研究计划和报告,到同行自身的绩效评估和晋升过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Naturwissenschaften》 |2010年第3期|237-239|共3页
  • 作者

    Sven Thatje;

  • 作者单位

    National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:30:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号