首页> 外文期刊>Nationalities Papers >To reject or not to reject nationalism: debating Marx and Engels' struggles with nationalism, 1840s-1880s
【24h】

To reject or not to reject nationalism: debating Marx and Engels' struggles with nationalism, 1840s-1880s

机译:拒绝还是不拒绝民族主义:辩论马克思和恩格斯与民族主义的斗争,1840-1880年代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The relationship between Marxism and nationalism has been tumultuous. While theoretically attempting to reject nationalism as a transient product of capitalism, Marxism has in practice oftentimes exploited its appeal and utilized its extensive institutional repertoire. To a large extent, the difficult dialogue between the two ideological constellations can be traced back to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels who neglected to leave a definitive statement on the nationality question. The article traces the evolution of Marxism's conceptualization of the nationality question - a slow shift from an outright rejection of nationalism to an acceptance of its progressive features, complexity, varieties and influences. It re-evaluates Marx and Engels' views on the nationality question, from its outright denial to limited acceptance and application. After identifying factors that shaped their perception of the nationality question, the study offers an analysis of the evolution of these attitudes from the 1840s to the 1860s. The objective is to show how Marx and Engels' theoretical dogmatism was tainted by their desire for activism. Their views were not inflexible but rather evolved in response to changing circumstances in the mid 19th century.View full textDownload full textKeywordsMarxism, nationalism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, historiographyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.685058
机译:马克思主义与民族主义之间的关系一直动荡不安。在理论上试图将民族主义视为资本主义的暂时产物时,马克思主义在实践中常常利用其吸引力并利用其广泛的体制。在很大程度上,这两个意识形态群之间的艰难对话可以追溯到卡尔·马克思和弗里德里希·恩格斯,他们忽略了关于国籍问题的明确声明。本文追溯了马克思主义关于国籍问题的概念化的演变-从彻底拒绝民族主义到接受其进步特征,复杂性,多样性和影响的缓慢转变。它从完全否定到有限的接受和适用,重新评价了马克思和恩格斯关于国籍问题的观点。在确定了影响他们对国籍问题的看法的因素之后,该研究对这些态度从1840年代到1860年代的演变进行了分析。目的是表明马克思和恩格斯的理论教条主义是如何被他们对行动主义的渴望所污染的。他们的观点并非一成不变,而是根据19世纪中叶不断变化的情况而发展起来的。 citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.685058

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nationalities Papers》 |2012年第4期|p.585-606|共22页
  • 作者

    Michal Kasprzaka*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:55:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号