首页> 外文期刊>Music Education Research >Collaborative learning in the music studio
【24h】

Collaborative learning in the music studio

机译:音乐工作室中的协作学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article presents some of the findings from a mixed-methods case study that investigated collaborative learning for pairs of higher education students working in a music studio on a drum kit recording. A stratified purposive sampling technique was used and students were allocated a partner of similar ability; often referred to as a socio-conflict approach. The pairs of students were then allocated a support mechanism (either a learning technology interface (LTI) or paper-based manual) to assist in their learning. Thirty-two separate 2-hour recording sessions were captured using a three-camera technique. In addition, the students completed a workbook and a mix-down on compact disc (CD) of a 2-minute recording of a drum kit. Video data was captured, transcribed and then analysed using Bales' Interactive Process Analysis. A percentage score was given to each of the workbooks and CD recordings. Data analyses indicated that the LTI encouraged more effective planning of the set task, and enabled better execution of pre-production activity, that it also encouraged 'full' collaboration, it enabled practical activity to be completed more quickly and the more time spent using the technology the higher the mark gained for the written work.
机译:本文介绍了一种混合方法案例研究的一些发现,该案例研究了在鼓室录音中在音乐工作室工作的成对高等教育学生的协作学习。使用了分层的有目的抽样技术,并为学生分配了具有类似能力的伙伴。通常被称为社会冲突方法。然后,为成对的学生分配了一种支持机制(学习技术界面(LTI)或纸质手册)来协助他们的学习。使用三相机技术捕获了32个单独的2小时录制会话。此外,学生们完成了一份练习册和一张2分钟的架子鼓录音光盘上的混音。视频数据被捕获,转录,然后使用Bales的交互式过程分析进行分析。对每个工作簿和CD录音都给出一个百分比分数。数据分析表明,LTI鼓励更有效地计划所安排的任务,并能更好地执行生产前活动,它还鼓励“充分”合作,使实际活动能够更快地完成,并花费更多的时间来使用。技术对于书面作品的得分越高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号