首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Where are the Missing Masses? The Quasi-Publics and Non-Publics of Technoscience
【24h】

Where are the Missing Masses? The Quasi-Publics and Non-Publics of Technoscience

机译:失踪群众在哪里?技术科学的准公共和非公共

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper offers a political-philosophical analysis of the state and publics in the age of technoscience to propose three distinct categories of publics: scientific-citizen publics constituted by civil society, quasi-publics that initiate another kind of engagement through the activation of 'political society,' and non-publics cast outside these spheres of engagement. This re-categorization is possible when the central role of the state in its citizens' engagement with technoscience is put upfront and the non-Western empirical contexts are taken seriously by Science, Technology and Policy (STP) studies. The paper argues that in most of the world the state maintains a political contract with technoscience to form a functional coupling as the state-technoscience duo, which shapes public engagement with science through different functional modalities of government. Civil society is the sphere of legitimate engagement and participation in technoscientific issues for the scientific-citizen publics. The quasi-publics choose to be in the shady zone of political society establishing a paralegal relationship with the state-technoscience duo, while the non-publics come into being due to conditions of extra-legality created by the duo. The non-publics are implicated in the political community paradoxically as an excluded category who cannot be included in deliberation because of their status as being expelled from political community in a 'state of exception.' The paper proposes that the scientific-citizen publics are mobilized in contrast to the quasi-publics and with reference to the non-publics, helping STP studies to identify the 'missing masses' of technoscience.
机译:本文对技术科学时代的国家和公众进行了政治哲学分析,提出了三类不同的公众:由公民社会组成的科学公民公众,通过激活“政治性”而引发另一种参与的准公众。社会”和非公众参与的互动范围之外。当国家在其公民参与技术科学活动中发挥中心作用,并且科学,技术和政策(STP)研究认真对待非西方经验背景时,这种重新分类是可能的。该论文认为,在世界上大多数国家,国家与技术科学保持着政治契约,以形成与国家技术科学二重奏的功能耦合,从而通过不同的政府职能模式塑造了公众对科学的参与。公民社会是科学公民公众合法参与和参与技术科学问题的领域。准公众选择进入政治社会的阴暗地带,与国家技术科学二人组建立法律助理关系,而非公共组织则是由于二人组创造的超法律条件而成立。非公众人士被非同寻常地牵涉到政治团体中,因为他们以“例外状态”被驱逐出政治团体的地位,因此无法纳入审议范围。本文建议动员科学公民,而不是准公共,并参考非公共,以帮助STP研究确定技术科学的“缺失群体”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号