首页> 外文期刊>Microelectronics & Reliability >Embed SRAM IDDOFF fail root cause identification by combination of device analysis and localized circuit analysis
【24h】

Embed SRAM IDDOFF fail root cause identification by combination of device analysis and localized circuit analysis

机译:嵌入式SRAM IDDOFF通过设备分析和局部电路分析相结合来识别故障根源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

SRAM is most important component in the logic product. The failure analysis on the SRAM is well developed, but the SRAM IDDOFF analysis is still challenging for the FA engineers. The product has passed the functional test when IDDOFF is measured. This will make electrical fault isolation very difficult. It will be easy to verify the IDDOFF leakage at die level, but difficult or impossible to verify the leakage at the transistor level. In this paper, a SRAM IDDOFF failed unit was analyzed and the conventional EMMI method was employed to do the fault isolation. The hotspot was easily found in the SRAM area. The EMMI signal cover the entire SRAM block, which indicates a gross leakage in the SRAM block. Subsequent layer by layer analysis didn't find any abnormality until contact level. Nanoprobing at contact level also shows nothing abnormal. To understand the leakage path, the SRAM circuit was studied under DC bias condition and combined with a cross-section analysis of the structure. Thus, a suspected leakage path was proposed. Based on this suspect the leakage can only be simulated at M1 level, and then the experiment was redesigned at Vial level. The leakage was successfully verified by the nanoprobing DC measurement at M1 level. Finally, the TEM analysis confirms the root cause for the IDDOFF fail. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:SRAM是逻辑产品中最重要的组件。 SRAM的故障分析已经得到了很好的发展,但是SRAM IDDOFF分析对于FA工程师仍然具有挑战性。测量IDDOFF时,产品已通过功能测试。这将使电气故障隔离变得非常困难。在芯片级验证IDDOFF泄漏将很容易,但在晶体管级验证泄漏将很困难或不可能。本文分析了一个SRAM IDDOFF故障单元,并采用传统的EMMI方法进行故障隔离。在SRAM区域很容易找到该热点。 EMMI信号覆盖整个SRAM块,这表明SRAM块中有严重泄漏。随后的逐层分析直到接触水平才发现任何异常。接触水平的纳米探测也没有发现异常。为了了解泄漏路径,在直流偏置条件下研究了SRAM电路,并与结构的横截面分析相结合。因此,提出了可疑的泄漏路径。基于此怀疑,只能在M1级模拟泄漏,然后在Vial级重新设计实验。通过在M1级进行的纳米探针直流测量成功地证实了泄漏。最终,TEM分析确认了IDDOFF失败的根本原因。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Microelectronics & Reliability》 |2017年第9期|261-266|共6页
  • 作者单位

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

    GlobalFoundries, Prod Test & Failure Anal, Singapore, Singapore;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号