首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy >On Heidegger, medicine, and the modernity of modern medical technology
【24h】

On Heidegger, medicine, and the modernity of modern medical technology

机译:关于海德格尔,医学和现代医学技术的现代性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines medicine’s use of technology in a manner from a standpoint inspired by Heidegger’s thinking on technology. In the first part of the paper, I shall suggest an interpretation of Heidegger’s thinking on the topic, and attempt to show why he associates modern technology with danger. However, I shall also claim that there is little evidence that medicine’s appropriation of modern technology is dangerous in Heidegger’s sense, although there is no prima facie reason why it mightn’t be. The explanation for this, I claim, is ethical. There is an initial attraction to the thought that Heidegger’s thought echoes Kantian moral thinking, but I shall dismiss this. Instead, I shall suggest that the considerations that make modern technology dangerous for Heidegger are simply not in the character — the ethos — of medicine properly understood. This is because there is a distinction to be drawn between chronological and historical modernity, and that even up-to-date medicine, empowered by technology, retains in its ethos crucial aspects of a historically pre-modern understanding of technology. A large part of the latter half of the paper will be concerned with explaining the difference.
机译:本文从海德格尔技术思想的启发出发,研究了医学对技术的使用。在本文的第一部分中,我将对海德格尔关于该主题的思想提出一个解释,并试图说明他为何将现代技术与危险联系在一起。但是,我也要声称,尽管没有表面上的原因,但几乎没有证据表明医学上对现代技术的挪用对海德格尔来说是危险的。我认为对此的解释是符合道德的。海德格尔的思想与康德的道德思想相呼应,这一思想最初吸引了人们,但我将对此予以驳斥。相反,我将建议认为,使现代技术对海德格尔构成危险的考虑因素,根本不是正确理解的医学特征(精神)。这是因为在时间现代性和历史现代性之间要加以区分,并且即使是由技术赋予力量的最新医学,也保留了其对历史的前现代技术理解的重要方面。本文后半部分的大部分内容将用于说明差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号