首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Road Maps for Learning and Teacher Evaluation
【24h】

Road Maps for Learning and Teacher Evaluation

机译:学习和教师评估路线图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Black, Wilson, and Yao (this issue) make a compelling case for a coherent model of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment, all built around a well-specified theory of learning. Arguing that dominant assessment policies and practices tend to drive pedagogy and student attitudes toward learning in pernicious ways, Black et al. make an argument that is as much about policy, values, and use as it is about assessment design. They propose an assessment system that is first and foremost about helping teachers understand how well students are learning with respect to a clear set of desired learning outcomes so that teachers can take appropriate steps to help students progress. They also note that for teachers to use learning progressions and assessments well, substantial professional development will likely be needed.
机译:布莱克(Black),威尔逊(Wilson)和姚明(Yao)(本期)为课程,教学法和评估的连贯模型提供了令人信服的案例,这些模型都围绕着一种特定的学习理论构建。布莱克等人争辩说,支配性的评估政策和实践倾向于以有害的方式推动教育学和学生对学习的态度。提出与政策设计,价值和用途同样重要的论点,与评估设计也一样。他们提出了一个评估系统,该评估系统的首要任务是帮助教师了解学生在一系列清晰的预期学习成果方面的学习状况,以便教师可以采取适当的步骤来帮助学生进步。他们还指出,要让教师很好地利用学习进度和评估,可能需要大量的专业发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2011年第4期|p.146-148|共3页
  • 作者

    Drew H. Gitomer;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers University, 10 Seminary Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:30:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号