首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Questioning the Consensus Definition of Validity
【24h】

Questioning the Consensus Definition of Validity

机译:质疑有效性的共识定义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The focus article provided me with an opportunity to unpack the consensus definition of validity and to explore its implications in the light of recent debates. I proposed an elaboration of the consensus definition, which was intended to express the spirit of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999) with increased precision, highlighting a range of features including the following:rn1. People assess in order to make decisions and, therefore, validity is ultimately a property of assessment-based decision-making procedures.rn2. Validity is a property of a procedure that describes its potential to support good measurement and, therefore, good decision making.
机译:重点文章为我提供了一个机会,可以对有效性的共识定义进行解压缩,并根据最近的辩论来探讨其含义。我提出了共识定义的详细说明,旨在以更高的精确度表达教育和心理测试标准的精神(美国教育研究协会,美国心理协会和国家教育测量委员会,1999)。功能范围包括:rn1。人们为了做出决策而进行评估,因此,有效性最终是基于评估的决策程序的属性。有效性是一个过程的属性,它描述了其支持良好度量以及因此形成良好决策的潜力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2012年第4期|110-122|共13页
  • 作者

    Paul E. Newton;

  • 作者单位

    Assessment Research and Development Group, Cambridge Assessment, 1 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 2EU, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:29:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号