首页> 外文期刊>Materials and structures >Rutting behavior and Theological modeling of EVA-modified binders in the mixture and binder scales
【24h】

Rutting behavior and Theological modeling of EVA-modified binders in the mixture and binder scales

机译:eVA改性粘合剂在混合物和粘合剂鳞片中的车辙行为和神学建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study addressed the rutting potential of binders prepared with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (AC+EVA) and this same copolymer combined with polyphosphoric acid (AC+EVA+PPA). Multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) tests at 64, 70 and 76 degrees C were conducted in the binder samples, as well as flow number tests at 60 degrees C in the mixture samples. The AC+EVA and the AC+EVA+PPA are equally graded on Superpave (76-xx), and rheological models were selected to further investigate this rutting behavior of the materials. The rankings of the most rut resistant mixturesAC+EVA+PPA, followed by the AC+EVA and the 50/70 base binderare exactly the same according to the binder parameters J(nr) (nonrecoverable compliance from MSCR), G(V) (viscous component of the creep stiffness from the Burgers model) and from the modified power model. However, the parameter J(nr, diff) (percent difference in compliances) showed a diametrically opposite trend in terms of the rutting resistance of binders, and this further suggests its inability to be used as a performance-related parameter in the Superpave specification.
机译:该研究解决了用乙烯乙烯基乙酸乙烯酯共聚物(AC + EVA)制备的粘合剂的车辙潜力,并将其与多磷酸(AC + EVA + PPA)联合的相同的共聚物。在粘合剂样品中在64,70和76℃下进行多种应力蠕变和恢复(MSCR)测试,以及在混合物样品中以60℃的流数试验。 AC + EVA和AC + EVA + PPA在SuperPave(76-XX)上同样分级,选择流变模型以进一步研究这些材料的这种车辙行为。最大RUT抗性混合物的排名+ EVA + PPA,其次是AC + EVA和50/70底粘牌的根据粘合剂参数J(NR)(来自MSCR的不可替解遵守),G(V)(来自汉堡模型的蠕变刚度的粘性成分)和改进的电力模型。然而,参数J(NR,Diff)(可行性差异)在粘合剂的车辙抗性方面表现出截然相反的趋势,这进一步表明它无法用作超级坝规范中的性能相关参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号