首页> 外文期刊>Materials and structures >Comparative study of the yield stress determination of cement pastes by different methods
【24h】

Comparative study of the yield stress determination of cement pastes by different methods

机译:不同方法测定水泥浆屈服应力的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Different methods have been proposed in the literature to determine the yield stress of cement grouts. These methods may present wide differences especially for thixotropic materials such as cement pastes. In this paper, different mixtures of water-cement-superplasticizer were studied for various w/c ratios and superplasticizer dosages. From shear tests of the mixtures in a rheometer, yield stress was determined in different ways: by identification on the experimental flow curve or by modelling flow curve through different rheological models. The conventional rheological models as Bingham model and Herschel-Bulkley model are not in agreement in the majority of the cases studied especially at low shear rates where thixotropy can be observed. In order to enhance the modelling in this area and allows to accurately determine the yield stress, we compared the results obtained through the conventional rheological models to that obtained by a thixotropy model. From the obtained results, it turns out that the latter allows to better predict the behaviour of thixotropic cement grouts and their yield stress.
机译:在文献中已经提出了不同的方法来确定水泥浆的屈服应力。这些方法可能存在很大差异,尤其是对于触变材料(例如水泥浆)。本文研究了不同比例的水灰比高效减水剂和高效减水剂的用量。通过流变仪中混合物的剪切测试,可以通过不同方式确定屈服应力:通过在实验流量曲线上进行标识或通过不同流变模型对流量曲线进行建模。在大多数研究的案例中,传统的流变模型(如Bingham模型和Herschel-Bulkley模型)并不一致,特别是在可观察到触变性的低剪切速率下。为了增强该区域的建模并允许准确确定屈服应力,我们将通过常规流变模型获得的结果与通过触变性模型获得的结果进行了比较。从获得的结果可以看出,后者可以更好地预测触变性水泥浆的行为及其屈服应力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号