首页> 外文期刊>Mass Communication and Society >When is Fiction as Good as Fact? Comparing the Influence of Documentary and Historical Reenactment Films on Engagement, Affect, Issue Interest, and Learning
【24h】

When is Fiction as Good as Fact? Comparing the Influence of Documentary and Historical Reenactment Films on Engagement, Affect, Issue Interest, and Learning

机译:小说什么时候像事实一样好?比较纪录片和历史重演电影对订婚,情感,发行兴趣和学习的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study advances documentary film effects research by comparing the influence of a political documentary with a historical reenactment film on narrative engagement, affect, learning, and interest. Using the Rwandan genocide as a context of study, a documentary film, The Triumph of Evil, and the historical reenactment fictional film, Hotel Rwanda, were examined. Results revealed significant differences between documentary and historical reenactment film exposure for affective responses and issue knowledge gain. However, increased issue interest and narrative engagement were not significantly different for the two stimulus groups, suggesting that dramatic fictional reenactments of socio-political events lead to increased issue interest as much or more than the live footage and factual account of events offered in a documentary. The results of this study are discussed in terms of their importance for key democratic outcome variables (e.g., knowledge and participation), along with suggestions for future documentary film research.
机译:这项研究通过比较政治纪录片和历史重演电影对叙事参与,情感,学习和兴趣的影响来推进纪录片效果研究。以卢旺达种族大屠杀为研究背景,考察了纪录片《邪恶的胜利》和历史重演的虚构电影《卢旺达饭店》。结果显示,纪录片和历史重演电影在情感反应和发行知识方面的暴露之间存在显着差异。但是,两个刺激因素对议题兴趣和叙事参与的增加没有显着差异,这表明戏剧性的社会政治事件的虚构再现导致对议题的兴趣与对纪录片中事件的现场录像和事实叙述的影响相同或更多。 。讨论了这项研究的结果对民主关键成果变量(例如知识和参与)的重要性,以及对未来纪录片研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号