首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Competition and Crowd-Out for Brand Keywords in Sponsored Search
【24h】

Competition and Crowd-Out for Brand Keywords in Sponsored Search

机译:赞助搜索中品牌关键字的竞争与淘汰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On search keywords with trademarked terms, the brand owner ("focal brand") and other relevant firms compete for consumers. For the focal brand, paid clicks have a direct substitute in the organic links below the paid ad(s). The proximity of this substitute depends on whether competing firms are aggressively bidding to siphon off traffic. We study the returns to focal brands and competitors using large-scale experiments on Bing with data from thousands of brands. When no competitors are present, we find a positive, statistically significant impact of brand ads of 1%-4%, with larger brands having a smaller causal effect. In this case, the effective "cost per incremental click" is significantly higher than what focal brands typically pay on other keywords. When the focal brand ad is present, competitors in paid positions 2-4 can "steal" 1%-5% of the focal brand's clicks and raise its costs by shifting traffic to the paid link. Finally, for a set of brands that face competition on their brand search but choose not to advertise, competitors "steal" 18%-42% of clicks, suggesting a strong causal effect of position. Under such position effects, we find the return on investment on defensive advertising to be strongly positive.
机译:在带有商标字词的搜索关键字上,品牌所有者(“重点品牌”)和其他相关公司争夺消费者。对于焦点品牌,付费点击在付费广告下方的自然链接中具有直接替代关系。这种替代品的接近程度取决于竞争企业是否正在积极竞标以吸引流量。我们使用来自数千个品牌的数据对Bing进行的大规模实验研究了重点品牌和竞争对手的回报。如果没有竞争对手存在,我们发现品牌广告产生了1%-4%的具有统计学意义的积极影响,而较大的品牌则具有较小的因果关系。在这种情况下,有效的“每次点击费用”明显高于焦点品牌通常在其他关键字上支付的费用。当存在焦点品牌广告时,处于付费排名2-4的竞争对手可以“窃取”焦点品牌点击的1%-5%,并通过将流量转移到付费链接来提高其成本。最后,对于在品牌搜索中面临竞争但选择不做广告的一组品牌,竞争对手“窃取”了18%-42%的点击次数,表明排名的因果关系很强。在这种位置效应下,我们发现防御性广告的投资回报率非常强劲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号