首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Selling Your Product Through Competitors' Outlets: Channel Strategy When Consumers Comparison Shop
【24h】

Selling Your Product Through Competitors' Outlets: Channel Strategy When Consumers Comparison Shop

机译:通过竞争对手的店铺销售产品:消费者比较商店时的渠道策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper develops a new rationale for decentralization in distribution channels: providing a one-stop comparison shopping experience for consumers. In our duopoly model, when consumers are knowledgeable about their brand preferences, each manufacturer would distribute through its own vertically integrated retail outlets only. When some consumers are unsure about their brand preferences, however, it may be optimal for one of the manufacturers to also distribute through its competitor’s outlets. The resulting equilibrium has several interesting properties. First, only one of the manufacturers chooses to add competitor-outlet distribution, not both—even when the manufacturers are symmetric. Second, the manufacturer distributing through its competitor’s outlets also distributes through its own outlets, i.e., its distribution strategy is a hybrid strategy, combining vertical integration and decentralization. Third, when the manufacturers’ brands are asymmetric, it is the weaker brand that has a stronger incentive to pursue hybrid distribution. Fourth, the competitor’s outlets in question welcome the new brand, even when no consumer would actually buy the new brand—a case of pure showrooming. These results highlight the linkages between distribution strategy, shopping efficiency, and retail formats. Shopping costs and consumers’ uncertainty about their own brand preferences create a demand for multibrand retailing, and in pursuing this demand, manufacturers may eschew the efficiency advantages of vertical integration in favor of hybrid distribution. However, the fact that only one of the manufacturers chooses to do so suggests that this strategy also has weaknesses, which we discuss in the paper.
机译:本文提出了分销渠道去中心化的新原理:为消费者提供一站式的比较购物体验。在我们的双头垄断模型中,当消费者了解他们的品牌偏好时,每个制造商只会通过自己的垂直整合零售店进行分销。但是,当某些消费者不确定自己的品牌偏好时,对于其中一家制造商来说,也可以通过其竞争对手的网点进行分销是最佳选择。产生的平衡具有几个有趣的特性。首先,即使制造商是对称的,也只有一个制造商选择添加竞争对手的出口分布,而不是两者都选择。其次,制造商通过竞争对手的网点进行分销,也通过自己的网点进行分销,即,其分销策略是一种混合策略,结合了纵向整合和分散化。第三,当制造商的品牌不对称时,实力较弱的品牌会更有动力追求混合分销。第四,即使在没有消费者实际购买新品牌的情况下,有争议的竞争对手的门店也欢迎新品牌(纯陈列室的情况)。这些结果突出了分销策略,购物效率和零售形式之间的联系。购物成本和消费者对自己品牌偏好的不确定性导致了对多品牌零售的需求,在追求这一需求时,制造商可能会放弃垂直整合的效率优势,而转向混合分销。但是,只有一个制造商选择这样做,这一事实表明该策略也存在弱点,我们将在本文中进行讨论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Marketing Science》 |2018年第1期|138-152|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada;

    Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309;

    Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    distribution channels; retailing; shopping behavior;

    机译:分销渠道;零售;购物行为;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:34:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号