首页> 外文期刊>Marketing intelligence & planning >A comparison of marketing teaching methods in North American and European universities
【24h】

A comparison of marketing teaching methods in North American and European universities

机译:北美和欧洲大学市场营销教学方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - To compare marketing education methods in Europe and North America, and analyse the opinions about effectiveness underpinning educators' choices among available options. Design/methodology/approach - E-mail questionnaires distributed to a sampling frame extracted from the worldwide directory of the Academy of Marketing Science were completed by 93 marketing academics in North America and 42 in Europe: a 26 per cent overall return rate. Data were analysed by χ~2, ANOVA and correspondence analysis. Findings - Three teaching-and-learning methods are most common in both environments: practical exercises, case studies and lectures. Europeans tend to rely on lectures and other traditional methods, while Americans make more use of technology-based alternatives. The approach to the subject in Europe favours practical exercises, for their connection to the real world. Practice in North America reflects a cultural predisposition to personalised teaching, by emphasising face-to-face small-group tutorials and one-to-one distance learning interaction. Teaching methods popular in the business world are little used across the sample, a somewhat paradoxical finding in a business-school environment. Research limitations/implications - The sample is comparatively small, and the European sub-sample is not further broken down into cultural sub-groups. Because the research instrument was adapted from one previous Spanish-language survey, terminology may have influenced the responses. Practical implications - The findings could be a useful input to planning of teaching and learning strategies, particularly in the international and distance-learning contexts. Originality/value - A rare comparative study of marketing education, suggesting fruitful directions for future research.
机译:目的-比较欧洲和北美的市场营销教育方法,并分析有关有效性的观点,这些观点是支持教育者在可用选项中进行选择的基础。设计/方法/方法-分配给从营销科学学院全球目录中提取的一个抽样框架的电子邮件调查问卷由北美的93名营销学者和欧洲的42名营销学者完成:总回报率为26%。数据进行χ〜2,方差分析和对应分析。调查结果-两种环境中最常见的三种教与学方法:实践练习,案例研究和讲座。欧洲人倾向于依靠讲座和其他传统方法,而美国人则更多地使用基于技术的替代方法。在欧洲,该主题的方法倾向于实践练习,因为它们与现实世界息息相关。北美的实践通过强调面对面的小组教程和一对一的远程学习互动,反映出个性化教学的文化倾向。整个样本中很少使用在商业世界中流行的教学方法,这在商学院环境中有些悖论。研究的局限性/意义-样本量相对较小,并且欧洲子样本并未进一步细分为文化子类别。由于该研究工具是根据先前的一项西班牙语调查改编而成,因此术语可能影响了答复。实际意义-研究结果可以为规划教学策略提供有用的投入,尤其是在国际和远程学习环境中。原创性/价值-一项罕见的市场营销比较研究,为以后的研究提供了有益的指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号