首页> 外文期刊>Managerial finance >How to explain the liquidity risk by the dynamics of discretionary loan loss provisions and non-performing loans? The impact of the global crisis
【24h】

How to explain the liquidity risk by the dynamics of discretionary loan loss provisions and non-performing loans? The impact of the global crisis

机译:如何通过全权委托贷款损失准备金和不良贷款的动态来解释流动性风险?全球危机的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLPs) and non-performing loans (NPLs) on the liquidity risk of both Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) before and after the global crisis that hit nations belonging to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Design/methodology/approach - This empirical study uses balanced panel data on 16 IBs and 58 CBs operating in the six Gulf Cooperation states covering 2000-2014. The data were obtained from the Bankscope database and the banks' annual reports. Findings - The results indicate that NPLs affect liquidity risk differently across the banks - specifically, there is a significant difference in the funding and managing of liquidity between the two bank types. The authors find that the influence of DLLPs does not vary across the banks in the overall analysis and before the crisis. This finding provides insights into the unique nature of banking risks in dual banking systems. The authors also find that after the crisis, the discretionary LLPs affected liquidity risk differently across the banks. Practical implications - This study has several practical implications. First, the findings suggest that the Islamic Financial Services Board and other IBs regulators should reassess several regulations, principles and products in order to reduce their credit and liquidity risks. Second, the study emphasizes the need for banks to perform a careful assessment of the effects of their LLP policies. Finally, the findings are also relevant to bankers, as they provide empirical evidence on the effect of loan growth on bank liquidity, suggesting that bankers should improve their loan management. Originality/value - First, this is the first study to examine discretionary LLPs, NPLs and liquidity risk in IBs; it is also the first comparative study between Islamic and CBs. Second, the study provides evidence on how the global crisis impacted the banking sector and identifies some of the main determinants of liquidity risk for both Islamic and CBs operating in GCC countries.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查全球金融交易前后全权委托贷款损失准备金(DLLPs)和不良贷款(NPLs)对伊斯兰银行(IBs)和常规银行(CBs)的流动性风险的影响危机打击了海湾合作委员会(GCC)成员国。设计/方法/方法-这项经验研究使用了在2000年至2014年期间在六个海湾合作州运营的16个IB和58个CB的平衡面板数据。数据来自Bankscope数据库和银行的年度报告。调查结果-结果表明,不良贷款对银行的流动性风险的影响不同-特别是,两种银行之间在资金和流动性管理方面存在显着差异。作者发现,在整体分析中和危机发生之前,DLLP的影响在整个银行之间没有变化。这一发现提供了对双重银行系统中银行风险独特性质的见解。作者还发现,危机过后,全权委托有限责任合伙人对银行间流动性风险的影响不同。实际意义-这项研究有几个实际意义。首先,调查结果表明,伊斯兰金融服务委员会和其他IB监管机构应重新评估若干法规,原则和产品,以降低其信贷和流动性风险。其次,该研究强调银行必须对其LLP政策的效果进行仔细评估。最后,这些发现也与银行家有关,因为他们提供了有关贷款增长对银行流动性影响的经验证据,表明银行家应改善其贷款管理。原创性/价值-首先,这是第一个研究IB中的酌情LLP,NPL和流动性风险的研究;这也是伊斯兰机构和认证机构之间的首次比较研究。其次,该研究提供了全球危机如何影响银行业的证据,并确定了在海湾合作委员会国家经营的伊斯兰和可转债的流动性风险的一些主要决定因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Managerial finance》 |2019年第2期|244-262|共19页
  • 作者

    Youssef Mohamed Riahi;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Accounting and Finance, GEF-2A Laboratory, High Institute of Management, Le Bardo, Tunisia and Department of Accounting, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Financial risk; Emerging markets; Banks;

    机译:财务风险;新兴市场;银行业务;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号