首页> 外文期刊>Management international review >Different Forms of Agency and Institutional Influences within Multinational Enterprises
【24h】

Different Forms of Agency and Institutional Influences within Multinational Enterprises

机译:跨国企业内部不同形式的代理和机构影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1.Given their exposure to diverse institutional settings, decision making in multinational enter prises (MNE) is marked by inconsistencies and conflict. Within the comparative institutional analysis (CIA) literature, such inconsistencies are seen as a source of experimentation or innovation. By contrast, in the international business (IB) literature, institutions are primarily understood as constraints on MNE activity. The latter focuses on 'institutional effects' taking institutions as stable and determining of social agency. As a way of addressing this limitation, we aim to understand the conditions that enable actors to engage in strategic action despite institutional pressures towards statis. 2.The research draws on systematic comparative case studies of two large MNEs in the chemi cal industry, headquartered in Germany and the UK, and operating in Italy, Germany, and Poland. It focuses on one example of agency, subsidiary efforts to change product formula tions that are successfully developed by the headquarters. 3.We demonstrate that agency within MNEs is influenced by a fit between MNE coordination structures shaped by home country institutions and host country institutions' demands for flexibility or collaboration. 4.Institutional incompatibilities between home and host contexts are unlikely to trigger actors' reflective capacity to change if the actors cannot draw on supportive coordination structures in the MNE. This is not just an 'institutional distance' argument as is commonly understood in IB. It is related to whether local institutions support the subsidiary to take advantage of specific opportunities conditioned by the home country institutions.
机译:1,鉴于跨国公司的机构环境多样,其决策过程中存在矛盾和冲突。在比较制度分析(CIA)文献中,这种不一致被视为实验或创新的根源。相比之下,在国际商务(IB)文献中,制度主要被理解为对跨国企业活动的限制。后者侧重于“制度效应”,以制度为稳定并决定社会代理。作为解决此局限性的一种方法,我们旨在了解使行为者尽管面临针对国家机构的机构压力,但仍能够采取战略行动的条件。 2这项研究借鉴了化学工业中两个大型跨国公司的系统比较案例研究,总部位于德国和英国,并在意大利,德国和波兰开展业务。它着重介绍了一个机构,子公司努力改变总部成功开发的产品配方的示例。 3.我们证明,跨国公司内部的机构受到母国机构塑造的跨国公司协调结构与东道国机构对灵活性或协作的要求之间的契合影响。 4.如果行为者不能利用多国企业中的支持性协调结构,则家庭和主人情境之间的制度不兼容性不太可能触发行为者的反思能力。这不仅是IB中通常理解的“机构距离”论点。这与当地机构是否支持子公司利用母国机构所提供的特定机会有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号