首页> 外文期刊>Management Decision >Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest and limits
【24h】

Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest and limits

机译:公共非营利组织的组织歧义性:利益和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the potential interest in and the possible limits of the concept of organizational ambidexterity (Duncan, 1976; Tushman and O'Reilly, 1996) in the context of public non-profit organizations (PNPOs), a concept that is frequently studied in the private sector. Design/methodology/approach From an inductive and qualitative approach, this research is based on observations of ambidextrous innovation processes implemented in a French PNPO in charge of job search and unemployment compensation operations. Findings This research shows that the concept of organizational ambidexterity might provide some strategic leads for balancing the possible paradoxes within different kinds of expectations of the stakeholders of PNPOs. It might also facilitate the combination of the stability of public service deliverance and organizational transformation. Beyond its interest, this study identifies the limits of the concept in the context of PNPOs. For overcoming its limits, the study suggests a renewed understanding of organizational ambidexterity by taking account of PNPOs' specificities, especially in terms of the regulation of the different tensions generated by ambidextrous organizational change. Research limitations/implications This research proposes a conceptual framework built with the integration of sectorial and organizational characteristics of the public non-profit sector for understanding the organizational ambidexterity and its possible strategic, organizational and management implications in this sector. The results are limited to the context the author studied because of several sectorial, national, organizational and cultural specificities. Practical implications The results might inspire management practices in PNPOs and potentially in private non-profit organizations or in voluntary organizations, since these three types of organizations could have certain similar organizational characteristics and might encounter similar questions in terms of strategy and innovation management. Originality/value This research suggests a renewed understanding of the concept of organizational ambidexterity in a sector in which the complexities, tensions and paradoxes generated by different stakeholders' expectations are probably more present but less explicit than other organizations.
机译:目的本文的目的是研究在公共非营利组织(PNPO)的背景下,组织灵活性概念的潜在利益和可能的局限性(Duncan,1976; Tushman和O'Reilly,1996)。在私营部门经常研究的概念。设计/方法论/方法本研究基于归纳和定性方法,基于对法国PNPO中负责求职和失业补偿业务的灵活性创新过程的观察。研究结果表明,组织灵活性的概念可能为平衡PNPO利益相关者的不同期望中的可能悖论提供一些战略性线索。它还可能促进公共服务提供的稳定性与组织转型的结合。除了它的兴趣之外,本研究还确定了在PNPO的背景下该概念的局限性。为克服其局限性,该研究建议通过考虑PNPO的特殊性,特别是在调节因组织灵活性而产生的不同紧张关系方面,重新认识组织的灵活性。研究的局限性/含义本研究提出了一个概念框架,该框架通过整合公共非营利部门的部门和组织特征来构建,以了解组织的灵活性以及在该部门中可能的战略,组织和管理含义。由于某些部门,国家,组织和文化的特殊性,结果仅限于作者研究的背景。实际意义该结果可能会激发PNPO中以及潜在的私人非营利组织或自愿组织中的管理实践,因为这三种类型的组织可能具有某些相似的组织特征,并且在策略和创新管理方面可能会遇到相似的问题。原创性/价值这项研究表明,在一个部门中,组织歧义性的概​​念需要重新认识,在该部门中,不同利益相关者的期望所产生的复杂性,紧张关系和悖论可能比其他组织更为明显,但不够明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号