首页> 外文期刊>Macworld >Poaching ideas
【24h】

Poaching ideas

机译:偷猎想法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A few years back, I was asked to appear (extremely briefly) on a Channel 5 news programme to talk about Apple's patent dispute with Samsung. The case seemed even then to have been going on for longer than Jarndyce vs Jarndyce, and patience was running short; it was felt by most observers that Judge Koh should knock the executives' heads together and tell them to stop wasting the court's time. Having never 'done TV before, I was unprepared for a classic presenters' trick: rehearsing the interview beforehand as a means to appropriate my carefully prepared remarks and use them as part of the filmed questions. (Keep your powder dry during rehearsals if you don't want to look like a mug - there's a bit of free advice for prospective TV interviewees.) But more than this, I remember being thrown by the suggestion that Apple vs Samsung "is just a playground argument, isn't it?" We were talking about products that bring in billions upon billions in high-margin revenue. How much more serious could it get?
机译:几年前,我被要求(非常简短地)出现在Channel 5新闻节目中,谈论苹果与三星的专利纠纷。甚至到那时,案件的审理时间还比Jarndyce对Jarndyce还要长,耐心也差强人意。大多数观察家认为,戈法官应将高管们的头撞在一起,并告诉他们不要浪费法院的时间。以前从未做过电视,所以我没有做好经典主持人的把戏的准备:事前演练采访是为了适应我精心准备的言论,并将其用作拍摄问题的一部分。 (如果您不想看起来像杯子,则在排练时将粉末弄干-对于潜在的电视采访对象还有一些免费建议。)但除此之外,我还记得被苹果和三星“只是操场上的争论,不是吗?我们在谈论的产品可以带来数十亿亿美元的高利润。它会变得更严重吗?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Macworld》 |2014年第10期|73-73|共1页
  • 作者

    David Price;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号