首页> 外文期刊>Machine Design >Who's at fault when a broach amputates fingers?
【24h】

Who's at fault when a broach amputates fingers?

机译:当拉刀截断手指时谁会出毛病?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A worker was preparing to broach a gear when he noticed a misaligned shim that would be damaged as the broaching machine started its run. As he reached into the machine to reposition the shim, he accidentally nudged the machine control into the run position with his other hand. The machine started its cycle and amputated three fingers on the man's right hand. The injured worker sued the machine manufacturer, claiming it should have installed guards or a two-palm-button setup with antitie-down measures that would have prevented the machine from cycling while he was reaching into it. OSHA had alerted the company to the need for guards nearly a year before the accident, and the company had been working on adding a light curtain.
机译:一名工人准备拉动齿轮时,他发现未对准的垫片会在拉床开始运行时损坏。当他进入机器以重新定位垫片时,他不小心用另一只手将机器控制装置推到了运行位置。机器开始运转,并用三根手指切断了该男子的右手。受伤的工人起诉了机器制造商,声称该机器应安装防护装置或具有防松措施的两手掌按钮装置,以防止机器在进入机器时发生循环。 OSHA在事故发生前将近一年已通知公司需要警卫,并且公司一直在努力增加光幕。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Machine Design》 |2010年第10期|p.46-46|共1页
  • 作者

    Jessica Shapiro;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号