首页> 外文期刊>London Review of Education >The discourse of widening participation and its critics: an institutional case study
【24h】

The discourse of widening participation and its critics: an institutional case study

机译:扩大参与的话语及其批评家:一个制度案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper takes as its focus the contradictory discourse of widening participation (WP). We argue that given the conflicting accounts of WP it is highly unlikely that higher education staff will be able articulate a coherent definition of WP practice. We illustrate our thesis with an institutional case study which analysed policy documents and was based on in‐depth interviews with staff. We found that not only did staff have contradictory definitions of WP, but that those who saw themselves as committed questioned the commitment of others. Thus despite institutional rhetoric our participants fell back on personal values when implementing WP activity.View full textDownload full textKeywordswidening participation, higher education, policy, valuesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.487328
机译:本文以扩大参与(WP)的矛盾话语为重点。我们认为,鉴于WP的说法相互矛盾,高等教育人员不太可能能够阐明WP实践的连贯定义。我们通过一个机构案例研究来说明我们的论文,该案例分析了政策文件并基于对员工的深入访谈。我们发现,不仅员工对WP的定义存在矛盾,而且认为自己忠诚的员工对其他人的承诺提出了质疑。因此,尽管存在制度上的言论,我们的参与者在实施WP活动时仍回落了个人价值观。 ,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.487328

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号