...
首页> 外文期刊>Logic Journal of IGPL >Replacing Modus Ponens With One-Premiss Rules
【24h】

Replacing Modus Ponens With One-Premiss Rules

机译:用一键删除规则替换方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

After some motivating remarks in Section 1, in Section 2 we show how to replace an axiomatic basis for any one of a broad range of sentential logics having finitely many axiom schemes and Modus Ponens as the sole proper rule, by a basis with the same axiom schemes and finitely many one-premiss rules. (Indeed, we also show that for the same range of logics, we can replace these axiom schemes by a single scheme, keeping the rules as for the replacement axiomatization just alluded to.) Section 3 mentions some questions arising from this replacement procedure (which works for many familiar sentential logics, including intuitionistic and classical logic), explores another such procedure, and discusses some aspects of the consequence relations associated with the different axiomatizations in play. Several open problems are mentioned. An appendix briefly treats the issue of a similar ‘at most one-premiss rules’ reformulation of proof systems with sequent-to-sequent rules.
机译:在第1节中进行了一些鼓舞人心的说明之后,在第2节中,我们将说明如何用具有相同公理的基础来替换具有有限多个公理方案和Modus Ponens作为唯一适当规则的广泛句子逻辑中的任何一种的公理基础方案和有限的一个一前提规则。 (实际上,我们还表明,对于相同范围的逻辑,我们可以用一个单一的方案替换这些公理方案,并保留与刚才提到的替换公理化有关的规则。)第3节提到了此替换过程引起的一些问题(为许多熟悉的句子逻辑(包括直觉逻辑和古典逻辑)工作,探讨了另一种此类过程,并讨论了与进行中的不同公理化相关的结果关系的某些方面。提到了几个未解决的问题。附录简要介绍了类似的“至多一个先决规则”对证明系统与后续规则相结合的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号