首页> 外文期刊>Local Government Studies >Assessing Best Practice as a Means of Innovation
【24h】

Assessing Best Practice as a Means of Innovation

机译:评估最佳实践作为创新手段

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper argues that Best Practice and innovation are different, if related activities, with Best Practice being just one of the means by which organisations can innovate. After reviewing the literatures on innovation diffusion and policy transfer, this paper reports the findings of two surveys of Best Practice in English local authorities on, respectively, regeneration and community safety. The paper finds that innovation is related to the CPA, but use of Best Practice is not; that greater capacity affects both innovation and the use of Best Practice; and that there is little link within authorities in the degree of innovation between policy sectors. In evaluating the use of Best Practice, the paper finds that local authorities encounter problems with assessing whether Best Practice is appropriate for their authority and judging whether Best Practice is in fact best practice. With Best Practice guides, the key problem is the difficulty in assessing whether the practice is as effective as the guides suggest and whether it would really work in a particular authority. The paper concludes that more effort could be made to ensure that readers of Best Practice guides can find out how the innovations really work and how they can be adapted to local needs.
机译:本文认为,最佳实践和创新(如果有相关活动)是不同的,而最佳实践只是组织创新的手段之一。在回顾了有关创新扩散和政策转移的文献之后,本文报告了两次关于英国地方政府的最佳实践调查的调查结果,分别针对再生和社区安全。该论文发现创新与CPA有关,但与Best Practice无关。更大的能力会影响创新和最佳实践的使用;当局内部在政策部门之间的创新程度上几乎没有联系。在评估最佳实践的使用时,论文发现地方当局在评估最佳实践是否适合其权威以及判断最佳实践是否实际上是最佳实践时遇到了问题。对于“最佳实践”指南,关键问题在于难以评估该实践是否如指南所建议的那样有效,以及在特定机构中是否真的有效。本文的结论是,可以做出更多的努力来确保“最佳实践”指南的读者能够发现创新的真正作用,以及如何使其适应当地需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Local Government Studies》 |2008年第1期|23-38|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Political and Economic Governance (IPEG), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;

    Institute for Political and Economic Governance (IPEG), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;

    Institute for Political and Economic Governance (IPEG), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;

    George Washington Institute of Public Policy, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号