首页> 外文期刊>Local Government Studies >Double-Devolution or Double-Dealing? The Local Government White Paper and the Lyons Review
【24h】

Double-Devolution or Double-Dealing? The Local Government White Paper and the Lyons Review

机译:是双重转让还是双重交易?地方政府白皮书和里昂评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New Labour's third White Paper promised the revitalization of local government after ten years of control freakery. It does not, however, live up to the promise of a 'new localism'. The tenor of the paper is moralising and prescriptive, claims to a new approach belied by the government's negative response to Lyons. Proposals for reform are ambiguous, offering no guarantees against back-door centralisation. Such cause as there may be for optimism largely depends on the capacity of localities to take the initiative. A fundamental debate about the role of local government, local democracy and the relationship between centre and locality is therefore still needed. Given the preponderance of path dependencies, strategic dilemmas and structural constraints upon the centre, the demand for local democracy will have to be initiated, voiced and organised by local citizens and councillors themselves.
机译:新劳工组织的第三份白皮书承诺,经过十多年的控制后,地方政府将振兴起来。但是,它不符合“新地方主义”的承诺。该论文的主题是道德化和规范性的,声称是政府对里昂的负面回应所掩盖的一种新方法。改革的提议是模棱两可的,不能为后门集权提供任何保证。乐观的原因在很大程度上取决于地方采取主动行动的能力。因此,仍然需要就地方政府的作用,地方民主以及中心与地方之间的关系进行根本性辩论。鉴于对中心的路径依赖,战略困境和结构性约束的优势,对地方民主的需求将必须由当地公民和议员自己发起,表达和组织。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Local Government Studies》 |2008年第1期|3-22|共20页
  • 作者

    Jonathan S. Davies;

  • 作者单位

    Public Management and Policy Group, Warwick Business School, Coventry, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号