首页> 外文期刊>Local Government Studies >Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21
【24h】

Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21

机译:参与式治理:民主的希望还是危险?地方21世纪议程案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Participatory governance is a concept that is receiving increasing prominence. However, more empirical research is needed to clarify whether participatory governance is beneficial or detrimental to democracy. The local level is a dynamic field for participatory experiments and, therefore, particularly rewarding for researchers interested in scrutinizing the impacts of participatory governance empirically. In this article, Local Agenda 21 serves as an example to discuss both hypotheses. The study, conducted predominantly in Germany, shows that neither the supporters nor the sceptics of participatory governance are completely right. The findings about Local Agenda 21 demonstrate that this form of participatory governance can improve civic skills and social capital, but has little impact on input-legitimacy and is barely effective, i.e. reaches the goal of enforcing sustainable development only to a limited degree.
机译:参与式治理是一个日益受到重视的概念。但是,需要更多的实证研究来阐明参与式治理是有利还是不利于民主。地方一级是参与性实验的动态领域,因此,对于有兴趣从经验上仔细研究参与性治理的影响的研究人员特别有益。在本文中,《 21世纪地方议程》作为讨论这两个假设的示例。这项主要在德国进行的研究表明,参与式治理的支持者和怀疑者都不是完全正确的。关于《 21世纪议程》的调查结果表明,这种参与式治理形式可以提高公民技能和社会资本,但对投入合法性影响不大,几乎没有效果,即仅在有限程度上实现了可持续发展的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号