首页> 外文期刊>Liverpool Law Review >Conditions not to Dispute Wills and the Inheritance (Provisions for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
【24h】

Conditions not to Dispute Wills and the Inheritance (Provisions for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

机译:1975年不违反遗嘱和继承的条件(家庭和受养人条款)法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, the author reviews the recent decision of the HighCourt in In the Estate of Nathan Deceased [2002] N.P.C. 79, TheTimes 6/4/02, relating to the validity and effect off conditionsnot to dispute wills (i.e., gifts by will on condition that thebeneficiary does not seek to challenge the will) and how such conditionsaffect claims made under the Inheritance (Provision for Family andDependants) Act 1975. The decision in this case reveals a considerabletension between the principle of testamentary freedom and the aims andoperation of public policy in this area of the law. In the article, theauthor maps out the changes which will have to be made in statements ofthe law in leading text-books relating to conditions not to disputewills and further argues that certain dicta in the case suggest that theHigh Court has now gone too far in preferring testamentary freedom overpublic policy, opening a door which may yet permit the triumph ofconstructive fraud in some cases.
机译:在本文中,作者回顾了高等法院在《弥敦道之死的庄园》 [2002] N.P.C.中的最新决定。 79,《泰晤士报》第6/4/02号,涉及不质疑遗嘱的条件的有效性和解除条件(即,在受益人不试图挑战遗嘱的情况下通过遗嘱送礼),以及这些条件如何影响根据继承提出的主张( 1975年《家庭和受抚养人法》。在此案中的判决显示,在法律领域,遗嘱自由原则与公共政策的目标和运作之间存在着很大的张力。在这篇文章中,作者列出了主要教科书中有关不涉及纠纷的条件的法律声明中必须作出的修改,并进一步辩称,该案中的某些判决书表明高等法院现在在优先考虑方面已经走得太远了。对公共政策的遗嘱自由,在某些情况下可能会开启建设性欺诈的大门。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Liverpool Law Review》 |2004年第1期|71-77|共7页
  • 作者

    Ian Johnson;

  • 作者单位

    School of Law, Manchester Metropolitan University, Elizabeth Gaskell Campus, Manchester, M13 0JA, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号