首页> 外文期刊>Linguistics and Philosophy >Plans, Affordances, And Combinatory Grammar
【24h】

Plans, Affordances, And Combinatory Grammar

机译:计划,能力和组合语法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are relatedsystems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than acentury. However, formal theories in the two domains have tendedto look very different. This article argues that both faculties sharethe formal character of applicative systems based on operationscorresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in thisway suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of bothsystems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the speciesand develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a moreprimitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world bycomposing affordances of objects or tools. Theknowledge representation that underlies such planning is alsoreflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, andaspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key tounderstanding both systems.
机译:自然语言语法和有计划的行动是相关系统的观点已经在一个世纪以上的心理学理论中被隐含了。但是,这两个领域的形式理论往往看起来截然不同。本文认为,这两个系基于对应于两个组合操作(即功能组成和类型提升)的操作而共享应用系统的形式特征。通过这种方式看待它们,可以更简单,更合理地说明这两种系统,并表明语言能力是通过物种或工具的可承受性,通过直接适应更原始的设备来规划世界上的目的性行为而在物种中进化而在儿童中发展的。时态,情绪和方面的自然语言语义也反映了作为这种计划基础的知识表示,本文从争论开始提供了理解这两个系统的关键。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Linguistics and Philosophy》 |2002年第6期|723-753|共31页
  • 作者

    Mark Steedman;

  • 作者单位

    Division of Informatics University of Edinburgh Buccleuch Place;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号