...
首页> 外文期刊>Light Plane Maintenance >Engine Vibration-0-320
【24h】

Engine Vibration-0-320

机译:引擎振动-0-320

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Over the last few months, my mechanic and I have been fighting an engine vibration problem that started after I had my airplane painted. We finally tried several different prop positions to see what impact it might have on the vibration problem. Apparently, my fixed-pitch propeller can be installed in any orientation on the mounting bushings of my O-320-D2A (Lycoming Service Instruction #1098G notwithstanding). Last week, we moved it one more time. I am quite sure it is now back in the position it was in when I bought the plane. There still seems to be a bit of "harshness," real or imagined in the engine, but the vibration is significantly reduced. This is what puzzles me. Can prop position make such a large difference? Since being moved, I have gotten two differing views from two mechanics as to whether the prop is currently in the correct position on the flange or not. Fact is, this is how all the prop re-orientation started because my mechanic was convinced the propeller wasn't installed correctly at the paint shop.
机译:在过去的几个月中,我和我的机械师一直在解决发动机振动问题,这是在飞机涂漆后开始的。最后,我们尝试了几种不同的支柱位置,以查看其对振动问题的影响。显然,我的固定螺距螺旋桨可以以任何方向安装在O-320-D2A的安装衬套上(尽管有《维修服务说明》#1098G)。上周,我们又将其移动了一次。我很确定它现在又回到了购买飞机时的位置。发动机中似乎仍然存在某种“真实性”或“虚构性”的“苛刻性”,但振动已大大降低。这就是令我困惑的地方。道具的位置能有很大的不同吗?自从移动之后,关于支柱当前是否在法兰上的正确位置,我从两位技师那里得到了两种不同的见解。事实是,这就是所有重新定向螺旋桨的方法,因为我的机械师确信螺旋桨在喷漆车间未正确安装。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号