首页> 外文期刊>The library >The Library of John Veysy (d. 1492), Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford, and Rector of St James, Garlickhythe, London
【24h】

The Library of John Veysy (d. 1492), Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford, and Rector of St James, Garlickhythe, London

机译:约翰·维西图书馆(卒于1492年),牛津林肯学院院士,伦敦加里克西斯圣詹姆斯大学校长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

All too often, the student of the libraries of pre-Reformation England has to rely for his sources on records that afford, at best, a partial picture. Most useful in establishing the contents of a particular collection are, naturally, full booklists or library catalogues that offer a snapshot at a given date, but these tend to survive mainly for institutional collections. For the libraries of private individuals, recourse must be made to an almost equally rare type of document, the probate inventory, which purports to list what a deceased individual possessed at the time of his or her death. Early examples of such inventories are in short supply: the records of the archbishop of Canterbury's prerogative court, one of the principal collections of testamentary documentation from the southern province, contains fewer than one hundred dating from before 1495, and of these only a fraction list book collections of any substance. Perhaps rather more tantalizing than helpful are the far more common testaments which scholars have sought to analyze in their hundreds, but which fall short in almost every respect, in that they not only name merely those of an individual's books of which he or she thought to make individual bequests, but also usually give no indication whether the testator already owned the book he wished to bequeath or relied on his executors to procure it for that purpose. The picture that these records provide is thus not only incomplete, but also unreliable. Nevertheless, at their best, probate records have more to offer than even actual library catalogues: in those rare instances where testament and probate inventory survive together, the combined records can give an indication not only of an individual's books but also of their probable movement into and out of his or her collection, both during the owner's lifetime and after his or her death.
机译:经常,改革前英格兰图书馆的学生不得不依靠其资料来充其量提供最多的局部图片。当然,在建立特定馆藏内容时最有用的是完整的书目或图书馆目录,这些书目或图书馆目录会在给定的日期提供快照,但这些内容通常主要用于机构收藏。对于私人图书馆,必须求助于几乎同等罕见的文件,即遗嘱认证清单,该清单旨在列出死者去世时所拥有的财产。这种存货的早期例子供不应求:坎特伯雷特权法院大主教的记录是南部省份遗嘱文件的主要收集之一,其中可追溯到1495年之前的记录不到一百份,而这些仅是一小部分预订任何物质的收藏。学者们试图在数百本书中进行分析的更普遍的遗嘱或许更诱人,而不是有所帮助,但它们几乎在各个方面都达不到要求,因为它们不仅仅列举了他或她认为要提及的个人书籍中的那些。进行个人遗赠,但通常也不会表明立遗嘱人是否已经拥有了他想遗赠的书,还是依靠他的遗嘱执行人为此目的而购买的书。因此,这些记录提供的图像不仅不完整,而且不可靠。然而,即使在最佳状态下,遗嘱认证记录所能提供的甚至比实际的图书馆目录还多:在极少数情况下,遗嘱和遗嘱认证清单一起存在,合并的记录不仅可以表明个人的书籍,而且还可以表明他们可能迁移到并且在拥有者的一生中以及去世后都从他或她的收藏中提取。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The library》 |2016年第4期|399-423|共25页
  • 作者

    HANNES KLEINEKE;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:49:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号